🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates “pig-butchering” scams—a sophisticated hybrid financial fraud integrating emotional manipulation, fake investment schemes, and social engineering. Method: Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 26 geographically diverse victims, we applied thematic coding alongside crime lifecycle modeling and a QCA-inspired stage-deconstruction approach. Contribution/Results: We identify a five-stage scam lifecycle; 87% of victims endured prolonged (multi-month) dual emotional and financial exploitation. Key contributions include: (1) the first empirically grounded, end-to-end behavioral model of pig-butchering scams; (2) a proposal for non-stigmatizing terminology to support victim-centered discourse; (3) identification of mechanisms underlying recurrent victimization; and (4) articulation of four critical intervention points within platform ecosystems, accompanied by four actionable, implementation-ready intervention strategies.
📝 Abstract
Pig-butchering scams, or Sha Zhu Pan, have emerged as a complex form of cyber-enabled financial fraud that combines elements of romance, investment fraud, and advanced social engineering tactics to systematically exploit victims. In this paper, we present the first qualitative analysis of pig-butchering scams, informed by in-depth semi-structured interviews with N=26 victims. We capture nuanced, first-hand accounts from victims across multiple regions, providing insight into the lifecycle of pig-butchering scams and the complex emotional and financial manipulation involved. We systematically analyze each phase of the scam, revealing that perpetrators employ tactics such as staged trust-building, fraudulent financial platforms, fabricated investment returns, and repeated high-pressure tactics, all designed to exploit victims' trust and financial resources over extended periods. Our findings reveal an organized scam lifecycle characterized by emotional manipulation, staged financial exploitation, and persistent re-engagement efforts that amplify victim losses. We also find complex psychological and financial impacts on victims, including heightened vulnerability to secondary scams. Finally, we propose actionable intervention points for social media and financial platforms to curb the prevalence of these scams and highlight the need for non-stigmatizing terminology to encourage victims to report and seek assistance.