Interpretable Question Answering with Knowledge Graphs

📅 2025-10-21
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the challenge of building explainable question-answering (QA) systems without relying on large language models (LLMs) or retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), focusing instead on pure knowledge graph (KG)-driven semantic retrieval and reasoning. Method: We propose a two-stage framework: (1) automatic construction of structured QA pairs from documents and domain-specific KGs; and (2) end-to-end graph retrieval, path re-ranking, and natural language answer generation via entity/relation embeddings, fuzzy graph matching, and a lightweight semantic rewriting model. Contribution/Results: Our key innovation is using a compact rewriting model to refine semantic representations of KG entity-relation edges, significantly enhancing both interpretability and answer accuracy. Evaluated on the CRAG benchmark with LLaMA-3.2 and GPT-3.5-Turbo as judge models, our approach achieves 71.9% and 54.4% accuracy, respectively—demonstrating the effectiveness and competitiveness of KG-only reasoning for explainable QA.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This paper presents a question answering system that operates exclusively on a knowledge graph retrieval without relying on retrieval augmented generation (RAG) with large language models (LLMs). Instead, a small paraphraser model is used to paraphrase the entity relationship edges retrieved from querying the knowledge graph. The proposed pipeline is divided into two main stages. The first stage involves pre-processing a document to generate sets of question-answer (QA) pairs. The second stage converts these QAs into a knowledge graph from which graph-based retrieval is performed using embeddings and fuzzy techniques. The graph is queried, re-ranked, and paraphrased to generate a final answer. This work includes an evaluation using LLM-as-a-judge on the CRAG benchmark, which resulted in accuracies of 71.9% and 54.4% using LLAMA-3.2 and GPT-3.5-Turbo, respectively.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Develops knowledge graph-based QA without LLM retrieval
Converts document QAs into queryable knowledge graphs
Uses graph retrieval and paraphrasing for interpretable answers
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Knowledge graph retrieval replaces RAG with LLMs
Small paraphraser model paraphrases entity relationship edges
Graph-based retrieval uses embeddings and fuzzy techniques
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
K
Kartikeya Aneja
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
M
Manasvi Srivastava
Department of Computer Science, Banasthali Vidyapeeth, Rajasthan, India
S
Subhayan Das
Huawei Ireland Research Center, Dublin, Ireland
Nagender Aneja
Nagender Aneja
Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Machine LearningDeep LearningNatural Language ProcessingComputer VisionGenerative AI