🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the weak speaker attribution capability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in multi-speaker, multi-turn dialogues. We introduce the first dedicated benchmark for evaluating “who said what and when” in multimodal settings. The benchmark integrates four corpora—CHiME-6, MELD, MultiDialog, and AMI—providing synchronized audio, transcribed text, and speaker metadata to support contextualized, fine-grained understanding. We propose a novel dual-task evaluation paradigm—question answering and utterance matching—assessed automatically via LLM-as-Judge and accuracy metrics. Experiments on over 12,000 samples reveal that while current MLLMs demonstrate strong comprehension of utterance content, their speaker attribution accuracy remains significantly low. Our benchmark establishes a high-challenge, reproducible evaluation framework and provides systematic analysis to advance speaker-aware multimodal dialogue understanding.
📝 Abstract
We present M3-SLU, a new multimodal large language model (MLLM) benchmark for evaluating multi-speaker, multi-turn spoken language understanding. While recent models show strong performance in speech and text comprehension, they still struggle with speaker-attributed reasoning, the ability to understand who said what and when in natural conversations. M3-SLU is built from four open corpora (CHiME-6, MELD, MultiDialog, and AMI) and comprises over 12,000 validated instances with paired audio, transcripts, and metadata. It includes two tasks: (1) Speaker-Attributed Question Answering and (2) Speaker Attribution via Utterance Matching. We provide baseline results for both cascaded pipelines and end-to-end MLLMs, evaluated using an LLM-as-Judge and accuracy metrics. Results show that while models can capture what was said, they often fail to identify who said it, revealing a key gap in speaker-aware dialogue understanding. M3-SLU offers as a challenging benchmark to advance research in speaker-aware multimodal understanding.