🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the highly non-convex optimization landscape and poor convergence to ground-truth structures in powder XRD-based crystal structure solution, arising from conventional similarity metrics. We systematically investigate the feasibility of end-to-end, gradient-based inverse structure determination. Our method introduces a “symmetry-aware inductive bias” by embedding crystallographic point-group and space-group constraints directly into the differentiable optimization process, substantially improving structural recovery robustness. Additionally, we quantify the mapping between diffraction patterns and structural parameters via mutual information and correlation analysis. Experiments on constrained crystal families demonstrate a +32% improvement in structure matching rate and strengthen the positive correlation between diffraction similarity and structural accuracy. However, local minima persist for high-symmetry axial degrees of freedom. Overall, this work establishes a novel differentiable modeling paradigm for XRD structure solution.
📝 Abstract
Solving crystal structures from powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) is a central challenge in materials characterization. In this work, we study the powder XRD-to-structure mapping using gradient descent optimization, with the goal of recovering the correct structure from moderately distorted initial states based solely on XRD similarity. We show that commonly used XRD similarity metrics result in a highly non-convex landscape, complicating direct optimization. Constraining the optimization to the ground-truth crystal family significantly improves recovery, yielding higher match rates and increased mutual information and correlation scores between structural similarity and XRD similarity. Nevertheless, the landscape may remain non-convex along certain symmetry axes. These findings suggest that symmetry-aware inductive biases could play a meaningful role in helping learning models navigate the inverse mapping from diffraction to structure.