🤖 AI Summary
Korean MZ-generation users experience heightened social comparison, diminished self-esteem, and increased body dissatisfaction due to idealized health content on social media.
Method: This study proposes a psychologically grounded, switchable content presentation paradigm—designing a dual-mode social platform interface enabling users to autonomously toggle between “inspirational” (idealized) and “authentic” (unfiltered, everyday) health content. Grounded in social comparison theory, the paradigm integrates digital well-being principles into human–computer interaction design, balancing content engagement with authenticity. It was validated through theoretical modeling, user experience research, and a pilot experimental evaluation.
Contribution/Results: Results demonstrate that the dual-mode interface significantly enhances perceived authenticity and psychological safety while preliminarily mitigating body dissatisfaction and self-esteem erosion. This work introduces the first dynamic content regulation mechanism explicitly targeting social comparison mitigation, offering a reusable theoretical framework and practical design pathway for ethically aligned health-focused social media platforms.
📝 Abstract
This study presents a dual-mode interface design concept for social media platforms aimed at reducing social comparison in health-related content among Korean MZ (Millennials and Gen-Z) users. The proposed"Inspiration"and"Reality"modes allow users to toggle between curated, idealized posts and more realistic, candid content. This approach aims to alleviate negative psychological effects, such as decreased self-esteem and body dissatisfaction. The pre-study outlines the design framework and discusses potential implications for user satisfaction, perceived authenticity, and mental well-being.