ConceptSMILE: Auditing the Trustworthiness of Concept-Based Explainable AI

๐Ÿ“… 2026-07-10
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
Current concept-level explainable AI methods lack an automated mechanism for credibility assessment. This work proposes ConceptSMILEโ€”a model-agnostic perturbation auditing framework that extends input perturbation logic from feature attribution to human-interpretable concept explanations. By applying locally weighted perturbations, measuring shifts in concept responses, and fitting an XGBoost surrogate model, ConceptSMILE establishes an independent credibility evaluation layer. Experiments on fundus images demonstrate that MedSAM-derived concepts achieve superior performance in spatial attribution and surrogate fidelity (Rยฒ = 0.8503), whereas vision-language model (VLM)-derived concepts exhibit greater faithfulness to vascular structures and enhanced robustness under specific artifacts.
๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Concept-based explainable artificial intelligence (AI) can make model reasoning more human-understandable, but concept-level outputs are not automatically trustworthy. We introduce ConceptSMILE, a model-agnostic perturbation-based auditing framework for evaluating the reliability of concept-based explanations. Rather than replacing SMILE, ConceptSMILE extends its perturbation-based logic from feature- or region-level attribution to the auditing of human-understandable concept explanations. The framework perturbs input regions, measures concept-response shifts, applies locality weighting, and fits an XGBoost surrogate to approximate local concept behaviour. Reliability is assessed through attribution accuracy, surrogate fidelity, faithfulness, stability, and consistency. We evaluate ConceptSMILE on retinal fundus images by comparing MedSAM-derived visual concepts with VLM-based semantic concepts. Results show that reliability varies across concepts and pathways: MedSAM achieves stronger spatial attribution and the highest surrogate fidelity ($R^2 = 0.8503$, $R_w^2 = 0.8465$), while the VLM pathway shows stronger vessel faithfulness and stronger stability under selected artefact conditions. ConceptSMILE provides an independent audit layer for evaluating the trustworthiness of concept-based XAI.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

concept-based explainable AI
trustworthiness
reliability
concept explanations
auditing
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

concept-based XAI
perturbation-based auditing
surrogate fidelity
model-agnostic framework
trustworthiness evaluation
M
Mohadeseh Mollapour
School of Computer Science, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
Koorosh Aslansefat
Koorosh Aslansefat
Assistant Professor of Computer Science, University of Hull
Reliability and SafetyAI SafetyTrustworthy AIExplainable AI
Z
Zeinab Dehghani
PhD Researcher (Engineering), WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
B
Bhupesh Kumar Mishra
School of Computer Science, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
Tejal Shah
Tejal Shah
Newcastle University
ontologyOWLinformaticsdata integrationknowledge representation
Z
Zhibao Mian
School of Computer Science, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom