Task-Specific Multimodal Question Answering Agents via Confidence Calibration and Incremental Reasoning for QANTA 2026

📅 2026-07-10
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of jointly optimizing response timing and answer accuracy in resource-constrained, pyramid-style multimodal question answering—comprising Tossup and Bonus subtasks—by introducing a lightweight dual-agent architecture. The Tossup agent dynamically determines when to buzz in through confidence calibration and domain-specific numerical reasoning, while the Bonus agent enhances answer precision by integrating prompt-aware processing, structured relational reasoning, and multimodal evidence fusion. Notably, the approach eschews external retrieval and model ensembling, relying solely on hosted models (GPT-4o-mini-class and GPT-4o-class). Evaluated on the QANTA 2026 challenge, it achieves a winning total score of 0.402 (Tossup: 0.238; Bonus Effect: 0.164), demonstrating the efficacy and efficiency of task-tailored reasoning strategies.
📝 Abstract
We present our submission to the QANTA 2026 shared challenge at the ICML 2026 Workshop on Efficient Multimodal Question Answering (EMM-QA). Quanta evaluates multimodal quizbowl systems that answer pyramid-style questions from incrementally revealed text and accompanying images while operating under realistic efficiency constraints. The challenge consists of two distinct tasks: Tossup questions, which require deciding when to answer under uncertainty, and Bonus questions, which emphasize accurate answer selection and human adoption. To address these differing objectives, we develop a task-specific two-agent architecture. Our Tossup agent utilizes a GPT-4o-mini-class model (referred to as GPT-4.1-mini in the competition logs) with confidence-calibrated answering and a domain-specific numeric reasoning policy that reduces overconfident predictions from isolated quantitative clues. Our Bonus agent uses GPT-4o-class model (referred to as GPT-4.1) with leadin-aware reasoning, structured relational reasoning, and multimodal evidence integration to improve exact answer selection. Rather than relying on a retrieval pipeline or model ensembles, our approach emphasizes efficient reasoning policies and confidence calibration within a hosted-only environment. Our system achieved the highest overall leaderboard score of 0.402, including a Tossup score of 0.238 and a Bonus Effect score of 0.164. The results demonstrate that lightweight, task-specific reasoning strategies can provide strong performance on resource-constrained multimodal question answering benchmarks.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Multimodal Question Answering
Tossup Questions
Bonus Questions
Confidence Calibration
Efficiency Constraints
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

confidence calibration
incremental reasoning
task-specific agents
multimodal question answering
efficient reasoning