Matroid Contention Resolution with Concentration

📅 2026-07-10
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing contention resolution schemes struggle to control lower-tail probabilities, limiting their applicability to optimization problems with coverage constraints. This work addresses this gap by introducing a novel property—strong λ-boundedness—for the Adamczyk–Włodarczyk random-order contention resolution scheme and formulating a sequential selection process model. This framework yields, for the first time, dimension-free lower-tail bounds independent of the ground set size. Leveraging this analysis together with concentration inequalities and matroid-constrained optimization techniques, the authors improve the approximation ratio for the k-matroid intersection coloring problem to O(k log k) and design the first bicriteria approximation algorithm for monotone submodular maximization that simultaneously handles both covering and packing constraints.
📝 Abstract
Contention resolution schemes (CRS) are a fundamental and widely applied tool for rounding fractional solutions subject to combinatorial constraints. However, the known analyses of CRS generally only guarantee lower bounds on the expected value and concentration on the upper tail, but no concentration on the lower tail. Thus, CRS are generally not applicable to problems that contain covering constraints, since certifying a covering constraint holds requires a lower tail bound. Our main contribution is to derive lower tail bounds for the output of a particular contention resolution scheme, the random-order CRS of Adamczyk and Włodarczyk, which we call AW. We show that every linear function of the rounded solution attains a constant fraction of its expectation with a failure probability that is dimension-free, depending only on the expected value and on the number of matroids, but not on the size of the ground set. Our analysis is driven by a new property we call \emph{strong $λ$-boundedness}, which strengthens the known $λ$-boundedness of AW by providing two-sided control on how rounding propagates between elements. We then introduce a random process capturing AW, a \emph{sequential selection process}, that may be of independent interest. We prove lower tail bounds for any strongly $λ$-bounded sequential selection process. To demonstrate the applicability of our new tail bounds, we apply them to two problems involving covering constraints. The first result is an $O(k \log k)$-approximation for $k$-matroid intersection coloring (improving the prior $O(k^2)$) when the chromatic number of at least one matroid is $Ω(k^3 \log n)$, where $n$ is the number of elements. The second is the first bicriteria approximation algorithm for monotone submodular maximization under $k$ matroid constraints together with packing and covering constraints.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Contention Resolution Schemes
Lower Tail Bounds
Matroid Constraints
Covering Constraints
Concentration Inequalities
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

contention resolution schemes
lower tail bounds
strong λ-boundedness
sequential selection process
matroid intersection coloring
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.