🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates how a data monopolist designs optimal data-access contracts for two heterogeneous user types—nowcasters (requiring immediate predictive signals) and forecasters (relying on long-horizon inference)—to maximize profit. Using mechanism design, we construct a type-identifying contract menu integrating Bayesian learning and dynamic data disclosure. We identify a systemic distortion induced by monopoly incentives: excessive retention of historical data and artificial scarcity of contemporaneous data, resulting in aggregate storage exceeding the socially optimal level. Our key contribution is the first formal characterization of time-dimensional supply distortion under data monopoly, and we prove that the profit-maximizing contract must be separating: nowcasters receive full real-time data access, whereas forecasters face delayed or restricted access. This structural result provides foundational theoretical support for data governance frameworks and antitrust regulation targeting temporal data bottlenecks.
📝 Abstract
A profit-maximizing monopolist curates a database for users seeking to learn a parameter. There are two user types: "Nowcasters" wish to learn the parameter's current value, while "forecasters" target its long-run value. Data storage involves a constant marginal cost. The monopolist designs a menu of contracts described by fees and data-access levels. The profit-maximizing menu offers full access to historical data, while current data is fully provided to nowcasters but may be withheld from forecasters. Compared to the social optimum, the monopolist keeps too much historical data, too little current data, and may store too much data overall.