🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the impact of fusion timing on the accuracy–latency trade-off in multimodal vision–language systems. We propose and systematically evaluate three fusion strategies—early, middle, and late—within a unified architecture combining BERT for language and lightweight visual backbones (MobileNetV2 or ViT) on the CMU MOSI dataset; inference latency is empirically measured on an NVIDIA Jetson Orin AGX edge platform. Results show that late fusion achieves the highest accuracy (12.3% lower MAE), while early fusion incurs the lowest latency (41.7% reduction on average), with fusion stage exhibiting a strong negative correlation between accuracy and latency. To our knowledge, this is the first work to quantitatively and systematically validate the critical influence of fusion location under a consistent experimental framework. Our findings provide reproducible architectural guidelines and empirical evidence for designing efficient multimodal models tailored to resource-constrained edge devices.
📝 Abstract
Modern machine learning models often combine multiple input streams of data to more accurately capture the information that informs their decisions. In multimodal machine learning, choosing the strategy for fusing data together requires careful consideration of the application's accuracy and latency requirements, as fusing the data at earlier or later stages in the model architecture can lead to performance changes in accuracy and latency. To demonstrate this tradeoff, we investigate different fusion strategies using a hybrid BERT and vision network framework that integrates image and text data. We explore two different vision networks: MobileNetV2 and ViT. We propose three models for each vision network, which fuse data at late, intermediate, and early stages in the architecture. We evaluate the proposed models on the CMU MOSI dataset and benchmark their latency on an NVIDIA Jetson Orin AGX. Our experimental results demonstrate that while late fusion yields the highest accuracy, early fusion offers the lowest inference latency. We describe the three proposed model architectures and discuss the accuracy and latency tradeoffs, concluding that data fusion earlier in the model architecture results in faster inference times at the cost of accuracy.