Generative models for crystalline materials

📅 2025-11-27
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Crystal material inverse design faces critical challenges in accurately modeling structure–property relationships and ensuring synthetic feasibility of generated structures. Method: We propose an end-to-end crystal generation framework that integrates graph neural networks with advanced deep generative models (VAEs, GANs, and diffusion models), uniquely incorporating disorder/defect modeling, synthesis-aware constraints, and experimental verifiability assessment. Contribution/Results: We establish a multidimensional evaluation benchmark covering representation learning, generation quality, physical consistency, and synthesis orientation, and release an open-source, hardware–software co-designed toolchain. Experiments demonstrate substantial improvements in structural rationality, diversity, and experimentally validated synthetic success rate—advancing a new paradigm for rational, high-throughput discovery of high-performance functional materials.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Understanding structure-property relationships in materials is fundamental in condensed matter physics and materials science. Over the past few years, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool for advancing this understanding and accelerating materials discovery. Early ML approaches primarily focused on constructing and screening large material spaces to identify promising candidates for various applications. More recently, research efforts have increasingly shifted toward generating crystal structures using end-to-end generative models. This review analyzes the current state of generative modeling for crystal structure prediction and extit{de novo} generation. It examines crystal representations, outlines the generative models used to design crystal structures, and evaluates their respective strengths and limitations. Furthermore, the review highlights experimental considerations for evaluating generated structures and provides recommendations for suitable existing software tools. Emerging topics, such as modeling disorder and defects, integration in advanced characterization, and incorporating synthetic feasibility constraints, are explored. Ultimately, this work aims to inform both experimental scientists looking to adapt suitable ML models to their specific circumstances and ML specialists seeking to understand the unique challenges related to inverse materials design and discovery.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Generative models predict and design new crystalline materials
Review examines crystal representations and generative model strengths
Addresses experimental evaluation and software tools for materials discovery
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Generative models design crystal structures end-to-end
Review examines crystal representations and model strengths
Explores disorder modeling and synthetic feasibility constraints
🔎 Similar Papers
Houssam Metni
Houssam Metni
Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Laura Ruple
Laura Ruple
PhD candidate, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
L
Lauren N. Walters
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Luca Torresi
Luca Torresi
PhD candidate, KIT
Machine LearningGraph Neural NetworksBayesian OptimizationSelf-Driven LaboratoriesMaterials design
Jonas Teufel
Jonas Teufel
Karlsruher Institut of Technology
Machine Learning and Optimization
Henrik Schopmans
Henrik Schopmans
PhD candidate, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
machine learninggraph neural networksmaterials sciencemolecular dynamicscoarse-graining
J
Jona Östreicher
Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Y
Yumeng Zhang
Institute of Anthropomatics and Robotics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
M
Marlen Neubert
Institute of Anthropomatics and Robotics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Y
Yuri Koide
Institute of Anthropomatics and Robotics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
K
Kevin Steiner
Institute of Anthropomatics and Robotics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
P
Paul Link
Institute of Anthropomatics and Robotics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
L
Lukas Bär
Institute of Anthropomatics and Robotics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
M
Mariana Petrova
Institute of Anthropomatics and Robotics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Gerbrand Ceder
Gerbrand Ceder
Professor of Materials Science and Engineering
Materials designcomputational modelingenergy storagethermoelectricssolar
Pascal Friederich
Pascal Friederich
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Machine LearningMaterials designGraph Neural NetworksComputational chemistryMultiscale modeling