Fast dynamical similarity analysis

📅 2025-11-27
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Traditional neural dynamical similarity analysis methods neglect intrinsic dynamical structure and suffer from computational inefficiency. To address this, we propose an efficient framework for comparing neural dynamical representations. First, nonlinear neural activity is mapped into a globally linear space via Hankel delay embedding. Second, the optimal embedding order is selected automatically, and lightweight affine constraints replace strict orthogonality constraints, substantially reducing optimization complexity. Third, a conjugacy-invariant dynamical similarity metric is defined by jointly minimizing the distance between dynamical matrices and applying data-driven singular value thresholding. Our method preserves the original dynamical invariance and sensitivity while accelerating computation by over an order of magnitude. It enables scalable, cross-modal comparison of dynamical structures across large-scale neural recordings and computational models.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
To understand how neural systems process information, it is often essential to compare one circuit with another, one brain with another, or data with a model. Traditional similarity measures ignore the dynamical processes underlying neural representations. Dynamical similarity methods offer a framework to compare the temporal structure of dynamical systems by embedding their (possibly) nonlinear dynamics into a globally linear space and there computing conjugacy metrics. However, identifying the best embedding and computing these metrics can be computationally slow. Here we introduce fast Dynamical Similarity Analysis (fastDSA), which is computationally far more efficient than previous methods while maintaining their accuracy and robustness. FastDSA introduces two key components that boost efficiency: (1) automatic selection of the effective model order of the Hankel (delay) embedding from the data via a data-driven singular-value threshold that identifies the informative subspace and discards noise to lower computational cost without sacrificing signal, and (2) a novel optimization procedure and objective, which replaces the slow exact orthogonality constraint in finding a minimal distance between dynamics matrices with a lightweight process to keep the search close to the space of orthogonal transformations. We demonstrate that fastDSA is at least an order of magnitude faster than the previous methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate that fastDSA has the properties of its ancestor, including its invariances and sensitivities to system dynamics. FastDSA, therefore, provides a computationally efficient and accurate method for dynamical similarity analysis.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Compares dynamical systems' temporal structures efficiently
Accelerates similarity analysis while preserving accuracy and robustness
Reduces computational cost via data-driven embedding and optimization
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Automatic data-driven embedding selection reduces computational cost
Lightweight optimization replaces slow exact orthogonality constraints
Maintains accuracy and robustness while being significantly faster
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Arman Behrad
Computational Neuroscience, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Mitchell Ostrow
Mitchell Ostrow
Graduate Student, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Computational NeuroscienceMachine LearningDeep LearningDynamical Systems
M
Mohammad Taha Fakharian
Neural Computation Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan
Ila Fiete
Ila Fiete
Professor of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT
Theoretical neuroscienceMachine Learning TheoryMemoryCognitive Maps
C
Christian Beste
Cognitive Neurosphysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Shervin Safavi
Shervin Safavi
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Computational neuroscienceCognitive neuroscienceSystems neuroscienceComputational psychiatry