Model-Based Reward Shaping for Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Stochastic Environments

๐Ÿ“… 2024-10-04
๐Ÿ›๏ธ arXiv.org
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 2
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
To address the theoretical failure and performance degradation of Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning (AIRL) in stochastic environments, this paper proposes a model-augmented AIRL framework that explicitly incorporates a dynamics model into the reward shaping processโ€”yielding, for the first time, a model-driven reward design for AIRL in stochastic settings with rigorous theoretical guarantees. Our core contributions are: (1) a novel theoretical analysis framework establishing bounds on both reward estimation error and policy performance gap; and (2) an algorithm that jointly optimizes transition model estimation and adversarial training. Experiments on MuJoCo demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing baselines in stochastic environments, maintains competitive performance in deterministic ones, and achieves substantially improved sample efficiency.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
In this paper, we aim to tackle the limitation of the Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning (AIRL) method in stochastic environments where theoretical results cannot hold and performance is degraded. To address this issue, we propose a novel method which infuses the dynamics information into the reward shaping with the theoretical guarantee for the induced optimal policy in the stochastic environments. Incorporating our novel model-enhanced rewards, we present a novel Model-Enhanced AIRL framework, which integrates transition model estimation directly into reward shaping. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the reward error bound and performance difference bound for our method. The experimental results in MuJoCo benchmarks show that our method can achieve superior performance in stochastic environments and competitive performance in deterministic environments, with significant improvement in sample efficiency, compared to existing baselines.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addresses AIRL limitations in stochastic environments
Proposes model-enhanced reward shaping with theoretical guarantees
Improves sample efficiency and performance in benchmarks
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Integrates transition model estimation into reward shaping
Provides theoretical guarantee for optimal policy in stochastic environments
Achieves superior performance with improved sample efficiency
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.