Classification and deontic explosion for contrary-to-duty obligations

๐Ÿ“… 2026-04-19
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF

career value

174K/year
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This study addresses the deontic explosion problem arising in counterfactual contexts within Carmo and Jonesโ€™s conditional obligation systems. It analyzes their 2022 axiomatic system and provides the first proof that this system suffers from a restricted form of deontic explosion. Furthermore, for the strongest version of their 1997 system, the paper introduces a novel model-theoretic classification based on a single forbidden possible world, thereby offering a complete characterization of its satisfiability. By integrating formal deontic logic, possible-world semantics, and axiomatic analysis, this work not only uncovers a logical flaw in the most recent system but also establishes a clear model theory for the earlier framework, thereby advancing the development of counterfactual deontic logic.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Carmo and Jones have presented a sequence of candidate axiom systems for conditional obligation between 1997 and 2022. For their most recent system we demonstrate a limited form of deontic explosion: given that a student does not get the highest possible grade on a test, any other passing grade is acceptable. In addition to that negative result, we give a positive one: revisiting the strongest version of Carmo and Jones' 1997 system, we provide a surprising classification of all satisfying models in terms of a single forbidden possible world.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

deontic explosion
contrary-to-duty obligations
conditional obligation
axiom systems
satisfying models
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

deontic explosion
contrary-to-duty obligations
conditional obligation
model classification
forbidden possible world
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers