๐ค AI Summary
This study addresses the deontic explosion problem arising in counterfactual contexts within Carmo and Jonesโs conditional obligation systems. It analyzes their 2022 axiomatic system and provides the first proof that this system suffers from a restricted form of deontic explosion. Furthermore, for the strongest version of their 1997 system, the paper introduces a novel model-theoretic classification based on a single forbidden possible world, thereby offering a complete characterization of its satisfiability. By integrating formal deontic logic, possible-world semantics, and axiomatic analysis, this work not only uncovers a logical flaw in the most recent system but also establishes a clear model theory for the earlier framework, thereby advancing the development of counterfactual deontic logic.
๐ Abstract
Carmo and Jones have presented a sequence of candidate axiom systems for conditional obligation between 1997 and 2022. For their most recent system we demonstrate a limited form of deontic explosion: given that a student does not get the highest possible grade on a test, any other passing grade is acceptable.
In addition to that negative result, we give a positive one: revisiting the strongest version of Carmo and Jones' 1997 system, we provide a surprising classification of all satisfying models in terms of a single forbidden possible world.