🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of validating the consistency between computer models and real physical processes both globally and within local subregions. The authors propose a frequency-domain hypothesis testing framework that combines kernel ridge regression to estimate model discrepancy with weighted generalized Fourier coefficients for statistical inference. The key innovation is the Fourier Maximum Modulus Test (FMMT), which, for the first time, enables closed-form p-value computation with simultaneous sensitivity to both global and local deviations. Theoretical analysis establishes the asymptotic normality of the Fourier coefficients. Experimental results demonstrate that FMMT achieves high statistical power, accurate Type I error control, and strong sensitivity to localized discrepancies in both synthetic and shear-layer datasets.
📝 Abstract
Computer simulations play an important role in scientific discovery and engineering innovation. Reliable computer models enable virtual experimentation that reduces the need for costly and time-consuming physical testing. However, the credibility of such models hinges on rigorous statistical validation against real-world data. This paper develops a formal frequentist framework for both global and subdomain validation of computer models. We propose the Fourier Maximum Modulus Test (FMMT), which leverages kernel ridge regression (KRR) to estimate the discrepancy between the computer model and the physical process, followed by a frequency-domain test based on weighted generalized Fourier coefficients. The theoretical analysis establishes the asymptotic normality of these coefficients, allowing for closed-form p-values. Simulation studies and a shear-layer experiment demonstrate that FMMT achieves high power, accurate Type I error control, and strong sensitivity to localized discrepancies.