Glitch in the Sky: Exploiting Voltage Fault Injection in UAV Flight Controllers

๐Ÿ“… 2026-04-17
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF

career value

214K/year
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This study addresses a critical security vulnerability in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flight control systems, demonstrating that their fail-safe mechanisms are susceptible to non-invasive voltage glitching attacks, thereby compromising system reliability. For the first time, the authors integrate ARMORY software-based fault simulation with the ChipWhisperer hardware voltage glitching platform to launch timing-precise attacks against the fail-safe logic of a UAV autopilot implemented on an STM32 microcontroller. This hardware-software co-design approach successfully identifies narrow execution windows harboring exploitable security flaws, enabling the suppression or manipulation of emergency responsesโ€”such as disabling failsafe landing protocols. The results validate the feasibility of timing-sensitive fault injection targeting flight controllers and underscore the tangible hardware-level security risks confronting cyber-physical systems.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
As Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) become increasingly pervasive and autonomous, ensuring the resilience of their embedded logic is critical to maintaining safety and integrity. Among the most stealthy and damaging threats are non-invasive fault injection attacks, where hardware-level disturbances propagate into software execution and compromise control logic. In this paper, we investigate the susceptibility of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) autopilot fail-safe mechanisms to voltage glitch fault injection. We introduce a dual evaluation approach: software-based fault simulation using ARMORY and hardware-based experiments with a voltage glitching platform (Chip-Whisperer), applying controlled and timely faults to an STM32 microcontroller running UAV-Autopilot fail-safe logic. Our targeted analysis of specific fail-safe modes uncovers timing-sensitive vulnerabilities that can suppress or alter safety responses, such as disabling emergency failsafe activation at critical moments, potentially enabling UAV hijacking. Furthermore, we validate software-based fault injection results against real hardware behavior, demonstrating how simulated attacks translate into tangible risks for CPS security and reliability.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

voltage glitch
fault injection
UAV autopilot
fail-safe mechanisms
Cyber-Physical Systems
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

voltage glitch injection
UAV flight controller
fail-safe vulnerability
fault simulation
Cyber-Physical Systems security
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Y
Yun-Ping Hsiao
Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Y
Yanda Li
Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Y
Youssef Gamal
Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Halima Bouzidi
Halima Bouzidi
Postdoctoral Scholar, University of California Irvine
Machine LearningEfficiencySecurityPrivacy
M
Mohammad Abudllah Al Faruque
Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA