🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of objectively evaluating whether next-generation quantum processors have achieved practical quantum advantage. The authors propose a protocol-level benchmarking framework that assesses hardware performance not at the gate level but through well-defined “quantumness thresholds” at the protocol level, yielding evaluation criteria that are more application-relevant, transparent, and intuitive. Applying this methodology to empirical comparisons between IBM’s Eagle and Heron processors demonstrates that the Heron architecture delivers significant performance gains on real-world tasks, thereby substantiating its tangible progress toward practical quantum advantage.
📝 Abstract
As quantum computing hardware rapidly advances, objectively evaluating the capabilities and error rates of new processors remains a critical challenge for the field. A clear and realistic understanding of current quantum performance is essential to guide research priorities and drive meaningful progress. In this work, we apply and extend a protocol-based benchmarking methodology (presented in arXiv:2505.12441) that utilizes well-defined quantumness thresholds. By evaluating performance at protocol level rather then the gate level, this approach provides a transparent and intuitive assessment of whether specific quantum processors, or isolated sub-chips within them, can demonstrate a practical quantum advantage. To illustrate the utility of this method, we compare two generations of IBM quantum computers: the older Eagle architecture and the newer Heron architecture. Our findings reveal the genuine operational strengths and limitations of these devices, demonstrating substantial performance improvements in the newer Heron generation.