🤖 AI Summary
In large-scale parallel GPU-based reinforcement learning, synchronous environment resets induce non-stationarity in the state distribution, leading to biased policy gradients and training instability. To address this, we propose Staggered Reset—a lightweight mechanism that introduces temporal diversity into rollout sequences by asynchronously initializing environments and randomizing reset timings, without incurring additional computational overhead. The method is fully compatible with standard on-policy algorithms such as PPO and requires no modifications to network architecture or loss functions. Empirical evaluation on high-dimensional robotic control tasks demonstrates that Staggered Reset improves sample efficiency, accelerates wall-clock convergence, and enhances final policy performance. Crucially, the gains scale positively with parallelism—larger numbers of concurrent environments yield greater improvements—thereby strengthening both stability and scalability of massively parallel RL training.
📝 Abstract
Massively parallel GPU simulation environments have accelerated reinforcement learning (RL) research by enabling fast data collection for on-policy RL algorithms like Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). To maximize throughput, it is common to use short rollouts per policy update, increasing the update-to-data (UTD) ra- tio. However, we find that, in this setting, standard synchronous resets introduce harmful nonstationarity, skewing the learning signal and destabilizing training. We introduce staggered resets, a simple yet effective technique where environments are initialized and reset at varied points within the task horizon. This yields training batches with greater temporal diversity, reducing the nonstationarity induced by synchronized rollouts. We characterize dimensions along which RL environments can benefit significantly from staggered resets through illustrative toy environ- ments. We then apply this technique to challenging high-dimensional robotics environments, achieving significantly higher sample efficiency, faster wall-clock convergence, and stronger final performance. Finally, this technique scales better with more parallel environments compared to naive synchronized rollouts.