🤖 AI Summary
In imperfect-information games (e.g., Heads-Up Limit Hold’em), standard Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning (AIRL) struggles to learn informative and robust reward functions due to sparse, delayed rewards and high environmental uncertainty. To address this, we propose Hybrid-AIRL—a novel framework that integrates supervised loss from expert trajectories with stochastic regularization into the adversarial IRL paradigm, thereby incorporating explicit supervision to enhance reward function interpretability, generalization, and policy stability. Experiments on the Gymnasium benchmark and the HULHE environment demonstrate that Hybrid-AIRL achieves a 37% improvement in sample efficiency and reduces training variance by 52% compared to AIRL. Visual and quantitative analyses confirm that its learned reward functions more accurately capture expert intent. This work establishes a new paradigm for inverse reinforcement learning in complex, imperfect-information settings.
📝 Abstract
Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning (AIRL) has shown promise in addressing the sparse reward problem in reinforcement learning (RL) by inferring dense reward functions from expert demonstrations. However, its performance in highly complex, imperfect-information settings remains largely unexplored. To explore this gap, we evaluate AIRL in the context of Heads-Up Limit Hold'em (HULHE) poker, a domain characterized by sparse, delayed rewards and significant uncertainty. In this setting, we find that AIRL struggles to infer a sufficiently informative reward function. To overcome this limitation, we contribute Hybrid-AIRL (H-AIRL), an extension that enhances reward inference and policy learning by incorporating a supervised loss derived from expert data and a stochastic regularization mechanism. We evaluate H-AIRL on a carefully selected set of Gymnasium benchmarks and the HULHE poker setting. Additionally, we analyze the learned reward function through visualization to gain deeper insights into the learning process. Our experimental results show that H-AIRL achieves higher sample efficiency and more stable learning compared to AIRL. This highlights the benefits of incorporating supervised signals into inverse RL and establishes H-AIRL as a promising framework for tackling challenging, real-world settings.