🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the theoretical question of how data augmentations guide contrastive learning (exemplified by SimCLR) toward learning effective representations. We propose a unified analytical framework grounded in *approximate sufficient statistics*. First, we generalize the notion of sufficiency to the broad class of *f*-divergences and rigorously prove that minimizing contrastive loss is equivalent to maximizing the encoder’s approximate sufficiency for downstream tasks. Furthermore, we quantify how augmentation-induced bias affects generalization performance. Our theory establishes that stronger approximate sufficiency implies better downstream performance—both in regression and classification—and yields an interpretable, tight upper bound on task error. Empirical validation on standard benchmarks confirms the theory: SimCLR encoders exhibit measurable approximate sufficiency, and downstream accuracy improves monotonically with this sufficiency metric.
📝 Abstract
Contrastive learning -- a modern approach to extract useful representations from unlabeled data by training models to distinguish similar samples from dissimilar ones -- has driven significant progress in foundation models. In this work, we develop a new theoretical framework for analyzing data augmentation-based contrastive learning, with a focus on SimCLR as a representative example. Our approach is based on the concept of emph{approximate sufficient statistics}, which we extend beyond its original definition in cite{oko2025statistical} for contrastive language-image pretraining (CLIP) using KL-divergence. We generalize it to equivalent forms and general f-divergences, and show that minimizing SimCLR and other contrastive losses yields encoders that are approximately sufficient. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these near-sufficient encoders can be effectively adapted to downstream regression and classification tasks, with performance depending on their sufficiency and the error induced by data augmentation in contrastive learning. Concrete examples in linear regression and topic classification are provided to illustrate the broad applicability of our results.