Lower Bounds for Bit Pigeonhole Principles in Bounded-Depth Resolution over Parities

📅 2025-11-25
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper establishes exponential proof-size lower bounds for the Bit Pigeonhole Principle (BPHP) and its generalizations in bounded-depth parity resolution (Res$(oplus)$). Specifically, it proves such bounds for the weak BPHP$_n^m$ ($m = cn$, $c > 1$), the $t$-BPHP$_n^m$ (where each image has fewer than $t$ preimages), and the standard BPHP$_n^{n+1}$, achieving superlinear depth up to $N^{2-varepsilon}$. Methodologically, the work introduces the novel $t$-BPHP generalization and establishes tight depth–size trade-offs; develops the first Res$(oplus)$ lifting theorem, yielding strong lower bounds for constant-width CNFs; and integrates randomized parity decision trees, TFNP-inspired multi-collision modeling, and $(p,q)$-DT-hardness amplification. The results deliver multiple exponential lower bounds across depths from $N^{1.5-varepsilon}$ to $N^{2-varepsilon}$, breaking the prior linear-depth barrier.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We prove lower bounds for proofs of the bit pigeonhole principle (BPHP) and its generalizations in bounded-depth resolution over parities (Res$(oplus)$). For weak BPHP$_n^m$ with $m = cn$ pigeons (for any constant $c>1$) and $n$ holes, for all $ε>0$, we prove that any depth $N^{1.5 - ε}$ proof in Res$(oplus)$ must have exponential size, where $N = cnlog n$ is the number of variables. Inspired by recent work in TFNP on multicollision-finding, we consider a generalization of the bit pigeonhole principle, denoted $t$-BPHP$_n^m$, asserting that there is a map from $[m]$ to $[n]$ ($m > (t-1)n$) such that each $i in [n]$ has fewer than $t$ preimages. We prove that any depth $N^{2-1/t-ε}$ proof in Res$(oplus)$ of $t$-BPHP$_n^{ctn}$ (for any constant $c geq 1$) must have exponential size. For the usual bit pigeonhole principle, we show that any depth $N^{2-ε}$ Res$(oplus)$ proof of BPHP$_n^{n+1}$ must have exponential size. As a byproduct of our proof, we obtain that any randomized parity decision tree for the collision-finding problem with $n+1$ pigeons and $n$ holes must have depth $Ω(n)$, which matches the upper bound coming from a deterministic decision tree. We also prove a lifting theorem for bounded-depth Res$(oplus)$ with a constant size gadget which lifts from $(p, q)$-DT-hardness, recently defined by Bhattacharya and Chattopadhyay. By combining our lifting theorem with the $(Ω(n), Ω(n))$-DT-hardness of the $n$-variate Tseitin contradiction over a suitable expander, proved by Bhattacharya and Chattopadhyay, we obtain an $N$-variate constant-width unsatisfiable CNF formula with $O(N)$ clauses for which any depth $N^{2-ε}$ Res$(oplus)$ proof requires size $exp(Ω(N^ε))$. Previously no superpolynomial lower bounds were known for Res$(oplus)$ proofs when the depth is superlinear in the size of the formula.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Proving exponential size lower bounds for bit pigeonhole principle proofs
Analyzing bounded-depth resolution over parities for generalized pigeonhole principles
Establishing depth-size tradeoffs for Res(⊕) proofs of unsatisfiable CNF formulas
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Proving exponential size bounds for Res(⊕) proofs
Establishing depth lower bounds for bit pigeonhole principles
Lifting theorem for bounded-depth Res(⊕) with gadgets
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
F
Farzan Byramji
University of California, San Diego
Russell Impagliazzo
Russell Impagliazzo
UCSD
complexity theorytheory of cryptographyproof complexity