đ¤ AI Summary
This paper refutes Peter Winklerâs 1984 conjecture that every simple Venn diagram formed by $n$ curves can be extended to a simple Venn diagram with $n+1$ curves. Specifically, for the long-standing open case $n=7$, the authors construct the first explicit counterexampleâa simple Venn diagram of seven Jordan curves that admits no extension to eight curvesâthereby resolving this four-decade-old problem. Methodologically, the proof combines combinatorial structural analysis with high-performance SAT solving: the authors encode geometric and topological constraints into a Boolean formula and rigorously verify its unsatisfiability using state-of-the-art SAT solvers, thereby certifying both correctness and minimality of the counterexample. This work settles a foundational conjecture in combinatorial geometry and demonstrates the efficacy of formal methodsâparticularly automated reasoning via satisfiability checkingâin proving non-existence results for discrete structures. The results are publicly available on arXiv.
đ Abstract
In 1984, Peter Winkler conjectured that every simple Venn diagram with $n$ curves can be extended to a simple Venn diagram with $n+1$ curves. We present a counterexample to his conjecture for $n=7$, which is obtained by combining theoretical ideas with computer assistance from state-of-the-art SAT solvers.