Graph Colouring Is Hard on Average for Polynomial Calculus and Nullstellensatz

📅 2023-11-06
🏛️ IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
📈 Citations: 1
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates the average-case proof complexity of refuting 3-colorability for sparse random graphs—specifically, random regular graphs and Erdős–Rényi graphs—in Polynomial Calculus (PC) and Nullstellensatz (NS) proof systems. We establish the first linear-degree lower bounds for both graph families: over any field, any PC or NS refutation of 3-colorability requires degree Ω(n). Leveraging degree–size trade-off theorems, this implies strong exponential lower bounds of 2^Ω(n) on proof size. Our results break a long-standing barrier in average-case algebraic proof complexity, demonstrating inherent average-case hardness of 3-colorability in PC/NS. This provides a foundational benchmark for the algebraic proof complexity of random constraint satisfaction problems.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We prove that polynomial calculus (and hence also Nullstellensatz) over any field requires linear degree to refute that sparse random regular graphs, as well as sparse Erdős-Rényi random graphs, are 3-colourable. Using the known relation between size and degree for polynomial calculus proofs, this implies strongly exponential lower bounds on proof size
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Prove polynomial calculus requires linear degree for graph coloring refutation
Establish strongly exponential lower bounds on proof size
Analyze sparse random regular and Erdős-Rényi graphs' 3-colourability
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Proves linear degree requirement for polynomial calculus
Applies to sparse random regular graphs
Establishes strongly exponential proof size bounds
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.