Physics-informed Neural Operator Learning for Nonlinear Grad-Shafranov Equation

📅 2025-11-24
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the real-time solution challenge of the Grad–Shafranov equation (GSE) in magnetically confined fusion, this work proposes a physics-informed semi-supervised neural operator method. We design a Transformer–Kolmogorov–Arnold Network Operator (TKNO) that jointly embeds physical constraints—via a physics-informed loss—and learns an end-to-end mapping from boundary parameters to equilibrium solutions. A semi-supervised learning framework is further introduced to leverage sparsely labeled data, enhancing both physical consistency and out-of-distribution generalization. Experiments demonstrate: (i) 0.25% mean relative L₂ error under full supervision; (ii) 0.48% interpolation and 4.76% extrapolation errors under semi-supervision; (iii) near four-order-of-magnitude reduction in PDE residual; and (iv) millisecond-level inference. This is the first approach to simultaneously achieve high accuracy, strict physical compliance, and real-time performance—establishing a new paradigm for online plasma control in fusion energy systems.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
As artificial intelligence emerges as a transformative enabler for fusion energy commercialization, fast and accurate solvers become increasingly critical. In magnetic confinement nuclear fusion, rapid and accurate solution of the Grad-Shafranov equation (GSE) is essential for real-time plasma control and analysis. Traditional numerical solvers achieve high precision but are computationally prohibitive, while data-driven surrogates infer quickly but fail to enforce physical laws and generalize poorly beyond training distributions. To address this challenge, we present a Physics-Informed Neural Operator (PINO) that directly learns the GSE solution operator, mapping shape parameters of last closed flux surface to equilibrium solutions for realistic nonlinear current profiles. Comprehensive benchmarking of five neural architectures identifies the novel Transformer-KAN (Kolmogorov-Arnold Network) Neural Operator (TKNO) as achieving highest accuracy (0.25% mean L2 relative error) under supervised training (only data-driven). However, all data-driven models exhibit large physics residuals, indicating poor physical consistency. Our unsupervised training can reduce the residuals by nearly four orders of magnitude through embedding physics-based loss terms without labeled data. Critically, semi-supervised learning--integrating sparse labeled data (100 interior points) with physics constraints--achieves optimal balance: 0.48% interpolation error and the most robust extrapolation performance (4.76% error, 8.9x degradation factor vs 39.8x for supervised models). Accelerated by TensorRT optimization, our models enable millisecond-level inference, establishing PINO as a promising pathway for next-generation fusion control systems.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Solving the Grad-Shafranov equation rapidly for plasma control
Overcoming computational limitations of traditional numerical solvers
Ensuring physical consistency in data-driven fusion modeling
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Transformer-KAN Neural Operator for nonlinear equation solving
Unsupervised physics-informed loss for physical consistency
Semi-supervised learning integrating sparse data with physics constraints
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Siqi Ding
Siqi Ding
ENNScienceandTechnologyDevelopmentCo.,Ltd.,Langfang,065991,China; HebeiKeyLaboratoryofCompactFusion,Langfang,065001,China
Zitong Zhang
Zitong Zhang
CollegeofMechanicalEngineering,Xi’anUniversityofScienceandTechnology,Xi’an710054,China; MOEKeyLaboratoryofThermo-FluidScienceandEngineering,SchoolofEnergyandPowerEngineering,Xi’anJiaotongUniversity,Xi’an710049,China
G
Guoyang Shi
ENNScienceandTechnologyDevelopmentCo.,Ltd.,Langfang,065991,China; HebeiKeyLaboratoryofCompactFusion,Langfang,065001,China
X
Xingyu Li
SchoolofPhysics,DalianUniversityofTechnology,Dalian116024,China
Xiang Gu
Xiang Gu
Xi'an Jiaotong University
transfer learningoptimal transportgenerative models
Y
Yanan Xu
ENNScienceandTechnologyDevelopmentCo.,Ltd.,Langfang,065991,China; HebeiKeyLaboratoryofCompactFusion,Langfang,065001,China
H
Huasheng Xie
ENNScienceandTechnologyDevelopmentCo.,Ltd.,Langfang,065991,China; HebeiKeyLaboratoryofCompactFusion,Langfang,065001,China
H
Hanyue Zhao
ENNScienceandTechnologyDevelopmentCo.,Ltd.,Langfang,065991,China; HebeiKeyLaboratoryofCompactFusion,Langfang,065001,China
Yuejiang Shi
Yuejiang Shi
ENNScienceandTechnologyDevelopmentCo.,Ltd.,Langfang,065991,China; HebeiKeyLaboratoryofCompactFusion,Langfang,065001,China
Tianyuan Liu
Tianyuan Liu
Donghua University
Welding AutomationComputer VisionDeep Learningand Intelligent Manufacturing Systems