Assessment of deep learning models integrated with weather and environmental variables for wildfire spread prediction and a case study of the 2023 Maui fires

📅 2025-09-05
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Wildfire spread prediction remains challenging due to complex spatiotemporal dynamics and limitations of both physics-based and data-driven models. Method: This study systematically evaluates five deep learning models—including ConvLSTM and its attention-enhanced variants—for wildfire spread forecasting using a multimodal spatiotemporal dataset integrating fire progression, wind speed, humidity, topography, and other environmental variables; it further applies explainable AI (XAI) to identify dominant drivers and conducts the first quantitative benchmark against the physics-based FARSITE model on the 2023 Maui wildfire. Contribution/Results: ConvLSTM-based models demonstrate superior input flexibility and environmental interpretability over FARSITE, whereas FARSITE achieves marginally higher overall accuracy and F1 score. The work establishes a novel cross-paradigm evaluation framework bridging AI and physical modeling, clarifying the applicability boundaries and enhancement pathways for data-driven wildfire forecasting, thereby advancing trustworthy, interpretable, and hybrid wildfire prediction paradigms.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Predicting the spread of wildfires is essential for effective fire management and risk assessment. With the fast advancements of artificial intelligence (AI), various deep learning models have been developed and utilized for wildfire spread prediction. However, there is limited understanding of the advantages and limitations of these models, and it is also unclear how deep learning-based fire spread models can be compared with existing non-AI fire models. In this work, we assess the ability of five typical deep learning models integrated with weather and environmental variables for wildfire spread prediction based on over ten years of wildfire data in the state of Hawaii. We further use the 2023 Maui fires as a case study to compare the best deep learning models with a widely-used fire spread model, FARSITE. The results show that two deep learning models, i.e., ConvLSTM and ConvLSTM with attention, perform the best among the five tested AI models. FARSITE shows higher precision, lower recall, and higher F1-score than the best AI models, while the AI models offer higher flexibility for the input data. By integrating AI models with an explainable AI method, we further identify important weather and environmental factors associated with the 2023 Maui wildfires.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating deep learning models for wildfire spread prediction accuracy
Comparing AI models with traditional fire spread models like FARSITE
Identifying key weather and environmental factors in wildfire prediction
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Integrating weather and environmental variables into deep learning models
Comparing ConvLSTM and attention-based models with traditional FARSITE
Using explainable AI to identify key wildfire factors
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Jiyeon Kim
Jiyeon Kim
Assistant Professor at Yale University
Cancer BiologyCancer metabolismLung cancer
Yingjie Hu
Yingjie Hu
Associate Professor, University at Buffalo
GeoAINatural HazardsDisaster ManagementCommunity ResilienceSpatial Data Science
N
Negar Elhami-Khorasani
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, NY, USA
K
Kai Sun
GeoAI Lab, Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
R
Ryan Zhenqi Zhou
GeoAI Lab, Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA