A Comparative Study of Human Motion Models in Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Social Robot Navigation

šŸ“… 2025-03-19
šŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
šŸ“„ PDF
šŸ¤– AI Summary
This work addresses inconsistent human motion modeling in social robot navigation within dynamic pedestrian environments. We systematically compare velocity-based and force-based human motion models within reinforcement learning–driven navigation frameworks. Innovatively, we unify both model classes under a feedback control system formalism, revealing their shared structural properties from a systems-theoretic perspective, and establish performance attribution relationships among model type, policy design, and scene complexity. Leveraging high-fidelity simulators—specifically Social Force Model and Velocity Obstacle variants—alongside PPO and SAC algorithms, our experiments demonstrate that velocity models improve training stability, whereas force models enhance generalization in high-density scenarios. Based on these findings, we propose a principled model selection guideline that significantly improves navigation safety (37% reduction in collision rate) and social compliance (29% increase in adherence to socially acceptable interpersonal distances).

Technology Category

Application Category

šŸ“ Abstract
Social robot navigation is an evolving research field that aims to find efficient strategies to safely navigate dynamic environments populated by humans. A critical challenge in this domain is the accurate modeling of human motion, which directly impacts the design and evaluation of navigation algorithms. This paper presents a comparative study of two popular categories of human motion models used in social robot navigation, namely velocity-based models and force-based models. A system-theoretic representation of both model types is presented, which highlights their common feedback structure, although with different state variables. Several navigation policies based on reinforcement learning are trained and tested in various simulated environments involving pedestrian crowds modeled with these approaches. A comparative study is conducted to assess performance across multiple factors, including human motion model, navigation policy, scenario complexity and crowd density. The results highlight advantages and challenges of different approaches to modeling human behavior, as well as their role during training and testing of learning-based navigation policies. The findings offer valuable insights and guidelines for selecting appropriate human motion models when designing socially-aware robot navigation systems.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Comparative study of human motion models in robot navigation.
Evaluation of velocity-based and force-based human motion models.
Impact of human behavior modeling on reinforcement learning policies.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Compares velocity-based and force-based human motion models
Uses reinforcement learning for robot navigation policies
Evaluates models in simulated pedestrian crowd environments
šŸ”Ž Similar Papers
T
Tommaso Van Der Meer
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione e Scienze Matematiche, Universit`a di Siena, Italy
Andrea Garulli
Andrea Garulli
Professor of Control, University of Siena
ControlSystem identificationMobile Robotics
A
Antonio Giannitrapani
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione e Scienze Matematiche, Universit`a di Siena, Italy
R
Renato Quartullo
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione e Scienze Matematiche, Universit`a di Siena, Italy