U-DESPE: a Bayesian Utility-based methodology for dosing regimen optimization in early-phase oncology trials based on Dose-Exposure, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy

📅 2025-11-21
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Traditional “maximum tolerated dose” paradigms fail in dose optimization for novel anticancer agents (e.g., targeted therapies, immunotherapies). To address this, we propose U-DESPE—a Bayesian framework integrating pharmacokinetic, safety, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy data into an exposure–effect nonlinear mixed-effects model. Crucially, U-DESPE introduces a utility function to jointly optimize multiple endpoints via weighted trade-offs, enabling precise identification of optimal dose–regimen combinations. It supports flexible dose-escalation and confirmation cohort designs, overcoming the limitations of toxicity-centric approaches. In real-world trial applications and extensive simulation studies, U-DESPE demonstrates superior operating characteristics—enhancing the scientific rigor, robustness, and personalization of dose-selection decisions in early-phase oncology trials.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
With the development of novel therapies such as molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose paradigm that "more is better" does not necessarily hold anymore. In this context, doses and schedules of novel therapies may be inadequately characterized and oncology drug dose-finding approaches should be revised. This is increasingly recognized by health authorities, notably through the Optimus project. We developed a Bayesian dose-finding design, called U-DESPE, which allows to either determine the optimal dosing regimen at the end of the dose-escalation phase, or use of dedicated cohorts for randomizing patients to candidate optimal dosing regimens after that safe dosing regimens have been found. U-DESPE design relies on a dose-exposure model built from pharmacokinetic data using non-linear mixed-effect modeling approaches. Then three models are built to assess the relationships between exposure and the probability of selected relevant endpoints on safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamics. These models are then combined to predict the different endpoints for every candidate dosing regimens. Finally, a utility function is proposed to quantify the trade-off between these endpoints and to determine the optimal dosing regimen. We applied the proposed method on a clinical trial case study and performed an extensive simulation study to evaluate the operating characteristics of the method.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Optimizing dosing regimens for novel oncology therapies beyond maximum tolerated dose
Developing Bayesian methodology integrating dose-exposure-safety-efficacy-pharmacodynamics relationships
Determining optimal dosing regimens using utility-based trade-off between endpoints
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Bayesian utility-based dosing regimen optimization
Combines dose-exposure-safety-efficacy-pharmacodynamics models
Uses utility function to determine optimal dosing regimen
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Anaïs Andrillon
Department of Statistical Methodology, SARYGA, France
S
Sandrine Micallef
Debiopharm International SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Moreno Ursino
Moreno Ursino
CRCN INSERM (equivalent to associate professor)
Statisticsclinical trialsordinal data
Pavel Mozgunov
Pavel Mozgunov
Programme Leader Track at MRC Biostatistics Unit
Early Phase Clinical TrialsAdaptive DesignsMedical StatisticsBiostatisticsDose Finding
M
Marie-Karelle Riviere
Department of Statistical Methodology, SARYGA, France