🤖 AI Summary
This work establishes, for the first time, a probabilistic robustness theory for nonconvex–nonconcave minimax problems within the scenario optimization framework. Unlike conventional approaches relying on nondegeneracy assumptions, our method directly characterizes robustness guarantees for key equilibrium points—including ε-stationary points and global minimax solutions—under stochastic constraints, uniformly handling both convex and nonconvex strategy sets. By integrating the extreme value theorem with Berge’s maximum theorem, we prove that the stationarity residual monotonically decreases with the number of scenarios and derive a computable sample complexity bound. The theoretical results are validated on unit commitment—a canonical nonconvex–nonconcave application—demonstrating both rigorous theoretical foundations and practical applicability.
📝 Abstract
This paper investigates probabilistic robustness of nonconvex-nonconcave minimax problems via the scenario approach. Inspired by recent advances in scenario optimization (Garatti and Campi, 2025), we obtain robustness results for key equilibria with nonconvex-nonconcave payoffs, overcoming the dependence on the non-degeneracy assumption. Specifically, under convex strategy sets for all players, we first establish a probabilistic robustness guarantee for an epsilon-stationary point by proving the monotonicity of the stationary residual in the number of scenarios. Moreover, under nonconvex strategy sets for all players, we derive a probabilistic robustness guarantee for a global minimax point by invoking the extreme value theorem and Berge's maximum theorem. A numerical experiment on a unit commitment problem corroborates our theoretical findings.