Scaffolding Minds: Optimizing Latent Visual Target Representations for Multimodal Reasoning

📅 2026-08-20
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文针对多模态推理中潜变量表示的优化问题,提出Scaffolding Minds方法,通过学习专用编码器和RL采样器的均值与方差来解决现有框架在监督微调及强化学习阶段存在的局限。
📝 Abstract
Latent reasoning has advanced multimodal reasoning through a two-stage training paradigm: (1) a helper image is encoded into latent tokens to teach visual chain-of-thought during a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) stage, and (2) these latent tokens are further refined with reward feedback during a reinforcement learning (RL) stage. In this paper, we identify two key limitations of this framework, one in each stage. First, the SFT stage typically relies on an off-the-shelf vision encoder to encode the helper image, yielding suboptimal latent representations that may not be well aligned with the downstream reasoning task. Second, existing RL methods treat the latent component only through deterministic regularization, which constrains policy drift but does not create alternative latent trajectories for exploration. To address these limitations, we propose Scaffolding Minds. Our approach learns a dedicated scaffolding encoder that provides an optimized target in latent space, and learns both the mean and variance of the RL sampler. We further show that these two improvements are complementary, together yielding substantial gains over strong baselines. Empirically, our method improves over the strongest latent-reasoning baseline by +9.5% on FrozenLake spatial planning, with the gain widening to +19% at 32x32 grid map, and by +5.2% on average across nine visual-centric reasoning benchmarks.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Latent Reasoning
Supervised Fine-Tuning
Reinforcement Learning
Latent Representations
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Scaffolding Minds
latent visual target representations
dedicated scaffolding encoder
mean and variance of RL sampler
multimodal reasoning
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.