Are LLMs becoming similarly creative? Evidence from three years of models

📅 2026-08-19
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
研究通过分析三年内大型语言模型在开放性任务上的表现,发现模型输出的多样性显著下降,可能影响人机共创工作的多样性。
📝 Abstract
Many benchmarks track Large Language Model (LLM) performance on tasks with verifiable answers, but less is known about how LLM performance is evolving on open-ended tasks, where creativity, originality and diversity may matter as much as quality. As LLMs increasingly support human ideation and creative work, understanding trends in LLM performance on open-ended tasks is critical. This paper presents a preliminary analysis of LLM creative outputs spanning three years of model releases, examining model responses to Infinity-Chat100, a real-world collection of open-ended user queries, and the Alternate Uses Task, an established psychometric creativity assessment. Using sentence-embedding similarity, we examine trends in LLM responses to these prompts. Our findings show a statistically significant decrease in model output diversity over time, suggesting that LLM outputs may be converging in creative substance across models. If this trend persists, LLM-driven homogenization may progressively diminish human agency in human-AI co-creative work, demanding careful consideration of LLMs' role in the human creative process.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Large Language Model
creativity
diversity
open-ended tasks
homogenization
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Large Language Model
Creativity
Diversity
Homogenization
🔎 Similar Papers
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
N
Nirav Patel
Department of Computer Science, Duke University
J
Josiah Crossman
Department of Computer Science, Duke University
E
Eva Aggarwal
Department of Computer Science, Duke University
Emily Wenger
Emily Wenger
Duke University
Machine LearningSecurityPrivacy