Retrieved but not ranked: surface-form bias in structural retrieval, from mathematics to agent trajectories

📅 2026-09-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
研究解决了结构检索中的表面形式偏差问题,通过在数学和轨迹两个领域评估嵌入检索方法,并使用词汇重排器和大语言模型重排器进行改进。
📝 Abstract
We evaluate embedding retrieval where surface form and meaning are pulled apart on purpose: retrieving items that share underlying structure but not wording, in two unrelated domains under one protocol, competition mathematics (MathNet-Retrieve; 500 queries, 117,088-item corpus) and embodied-agent trajectories (ALFWorld-derived; 118 queries, 336 trajectories). In mathematics the failure is complete: strict Hit@1 at the heaviest disguise tier is 0.0% for both production embedders (bootstrap 95% CI [0.0, 0.0]) while the correct item sits in the top 10 nearly always, and in 95.2 to 99.8% of misses the winner is more lexically similar to the query than the correct answer. In trajectories, where surface variation is incidental, the same models land at or near hypergeometric chance when gold must involve a different object, and below chance for all three embedders once gold must differ in object and receptacle: retrieval anchors on literal tokens, not task structure. A lexical reranker control hurts in mathematics and helps in trajectories (closing 26 to 36% of the gap, CIs excluding zero); its sign reveals whether a benchmark's surface variation is adversarial or incidental. An LLM reranker recovers 5 to 63% of the gap in mathematics and 43 to 76% in trajectories; direction replicates across three judges (all 21 cells positive), but effect sizes, tier profiles, and the outlier judge change with domain (paired differences excluding zero everywhere). Mathematics gains concentrate on well-known competitions (+19.8 points, CI [+6.7, +33.2], one of six cells), so part of the recovery is memorization. In a paired downstream experiment (210 queries, graders at 96 to 99% agreement), oracle retrieval was indistinguishable from adversarially bad retrieval (McNemar p = 0.678); the solver's 69.5% zero-shot accuracy is largely a truncation proxy (97 to 100% on finished answers), leaving no headroom.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

surface-form bias
structural retrieval
embedding retrieval
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

embedding retrieval
surface-form bias
lexical reranker
LLM reranker
task structure
🔎 Similar Papers
2024-05-03Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information RetrievalCitations: 2