Comparing Differentiable Logics for Learning with Logical Constraints

📅 2024-07-04
🏛️ Science of Computer Programming
📈 Citations: 4
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Ensuring correctness and safety of deep learning models by effectively injecting first-order logic (FOL) constraints remains challenging due to the lack of systematic understanding across differentiable logic frameworks. Method: We conduct the first unified empirical evaluation of mainstream differentiable logic approaches—including Logic Tensor Networks, DeepProbLog, and Semantic Loss—analyzing their fundamental trade-offs among logical expressivity, training stability, and generalization. We further propose principled guidelines for selecting appropriate differentiable logic formalisms based on task structure and constraint semantics. Contribution/Results: Our analysis reveals that the choice of logical formalism significantly impacts both predictive accuracy and constraint satisfaction rate. On benchmark tasks—including MNIST+parity and graph reasoning—we demonstrate up to a 37% improvement in constraint satisfaction under optimal formalism selection. This work establishes theoretical foundations and practical methodologies for knowledge-guided learning in neuro-symbolic integration, advancing reliable, constraint-aware deep learning.

Technology Category

Application Category

Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Learning from data often misses background knowledge.
Neural network verifiers assume fixed weights post-training.
Differentiable logics encode constraints to guide learning.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Differentiable logics encode logical constraints
Neural network verifiers ensure model correctness
Framework for training with differentiable logics
🔎 Similar Papers
2023-09-27International Conference on Learning RepresentationsCitations: 2