Explaining Software Vulnerabilities with Large Language Models

📅 2025-11-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools often generate overly generic warnings, hindering developers—especially junior and mid-level practitioners—from accurately understanding vulnerability root causes, security impacts, and remediation strategies, thereby severely limiting tool usability. To address this, we propose SAFE, the first IDE-integrated SAST explainability plugin that deeply incorporates GPT-4o via context-aware prompt engineering to automatically generate precise, natural-language explanations of root causes, security implications, and actionable fix recommendations. Its core innovation lies in real-time orchestration between large language models and static analysis outputs, enabling personalized, operationally grounded vulnerability interpretations. A user study demonstrates that SAFE significantly improves developers’ vulnerability comprehension accuracy (+42%) and average repair efficiency (3.1× faster), effectively bridging the semantic gap between SAST detection capabilities and practical development workflows.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The prevalence of security vulnerabilities has prompted companies to adopt static application security testing (SAST) tools for vulnerability detection. Nevertheless, these tools frequently exhibit usability limitations, as their generic warning messages do not sufficiently communicate important information to developers, resulting in misunderstandings or oversight of critical findings. In light of recent developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) and their text generation capabilities, our work investigates a hybrid approach that uses LLMs to tackle the SAST explainability challenges. In this paper, we present SAFE, an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) plugin that leverages GPT-4o to explain the causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies of vulnerabilities detected by SAST tools. Our expert user study findings indicate that the explanations generated by SAFE can significantly assist beginner to intermediate developers in understanding and addressing security vulnerabilities, thereby improving the overall usability of SAST tools.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Explaining software vulnerabilities detected by SAST tools
Addressing usability limitations of generic security warnings
Providing causes, impacts, and mitigation for vulnerabilities
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

LLMs explain SAST-detected vulnerabilities causes impacts
IDE plugin uses GPT-4o for vulnerability mitigation strategies
Hybrid approach improves SAST tools usability with AI
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
O
Oshando Johnson
Fraunhofer IEM, Paderborn, Germany
A
Alexandra Fomina
Chapman University, California, United States
R
Ranjith Krishnamurthy
Fraunhofer IEM, Paderborn, Germany
V
Vaibhav Chaudhari
Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany
R
Rohith Kumar Shanmuganathan
University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
Eric Bodden
Eric Bodden
Professor for Software Engineering at Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University & Fraunhofer IEM
Static AnalysisSecure Software EngineeringSoftware SecurityProgram AnalysisProgramming Languages