AdversariaLLM: A Unified and Modular Toolbox for LLM Robustness Research

📅 2025-11-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current LLM safety research suffers from fragmented implementations, inconsistent datasets and evaluation protocols, and poor reproducibility. To address these challenges, we introduce the first open-source, unified toolbox dedicated to LLM safety assessment. It features a modular architecture integrating 12 adversarial attack algorithms and 7 benchmark datasets, supports plug-and-play inference with Hugging Face models, and enables automated evaluation via JudgeZoo. The toolbox incorporates distributed evaluation, deterministic execution, computational resource monitoring, and multi-dimensional robustness assessment—including harmfulness, over-refusal, and utility—thereby substantially improving experimental reproducibility and cross-study comparability. Its core innovation lies in establishing a standardized, extensible, end-to-end security evaluation framework, providing transparent, reliable, and verifiable infrastructure for rigorous LLM safety research.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The rapid expansion of research on Large Language Model (LLM) safety and robustness has produced a fragmented and oftentimes buggy ecosystem of implementations, datasets, and evaluation methods. This fragmentation makes reproducibility and comparability across studies challenging, hindering meaningful progress. To address these issues, we introduce AdversariaLLM, a toolbox for conducting LLM jailbreak robustness research. Its design centers on reproducibility, correctness, and extensibility. The framework implements twelve adversarial attack algorithms, integrates seven benchmark datasets spanning harmfulness, over-refusal, and utility evaluation, and provides access to a wide range of open-weight LLMs via Hugging Face. The implementation includes advanced features for comparability and reproducibility such as compute-resource tracking, deterministic results, and distributional evaluation techniques. ame also integrates judging through the companion package JudgeZoo, which can also be used independently. Together, these components aim to establish a robust foundation for transparent, comparable, and reproducible research in LLM safety.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addressing fragmented LLM safety research ecosystem
Ensuring reproducibility and comparability across studies
Providing unified toolbox for jailbreak robustness evaluation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Unified modular toolbox for LLM robustness research
Implements twelve adversarial attack algorithms
Integrates seven benchmark datasets and open-weight LLMs
🔎 Similar Papers
Tim Beyer
Tim Beyer
Technical University of Munich
Music MLTime SeriesLLM Robustness3D Understanding
J
Jonas Dornbusch
Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, Germany
J
Jakob Steimle
Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, Germany
M
Moritz Ladenburger
Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, Germany
Leo Schwinn
Leo Schwinn
Technical University of Munich
Machine LearningDeep LearningAdversarial Attacks
S
Stephan Gunnemann
Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, Germany