Landslide Hazard Mapping with Geospatial Foundation Models: Geographical Generalizability, Data Scarcity, and Band Adaptability

📅 2025-11-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Landslide mapping suffers from poor generalization across regions, sensors, and scarce-label scenarios, hindering timely disaster response. To address this, we propose a three-axis analytical framework—sensor, label, and domain—and systematically adapt the geospatial foundation model Prithvi-EO-2.0 for landslide mapping. Our approach leverages global remote sensing data for self-supervised pretraining and introduces an adaptable fine-tuning strategy to support multispectral and heterogeneous sensor inputs. Compared with task-specific models (e.g., U-Net, SegFormer), our method achieves consistently high accuracy and robustness across diverse geographical regions and data-limited settings. Experiments demonstrate significant resilience to spectral band discrepancies, extreme label scarcity, and cross-domain transfer. This work establishes a new paradigm for scalable, generalizable intelligent landslide risk monitoring.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Landslides cause severe damage to lives, infrastructure, and the environment, making accurate and timely mapping essential for disaster preparedness and response. However, conventional deep learning models often struggle when applied across different sensors, regions, or under conditions of limited training data. To address these challenges, we present a three-axis analytical framework of sensor, label, and domain for adapting geospatial foundation models (GeoFMs), focusing on Prithvi-EO-2.0 for landslide mapping. Through a series of experiments, we show that it consistently outperforms task-specific CNNs (U-Net, U-Net++), vision transformers (Segformer, SwinV2-B), and other GeoFMs (TerraMind, SatMAE). The model, built on global pretraining, self-supervision, and adaptable fine-tuning, proved resilient to spectral variation, maintained accuracy under label scarcity, and generalized more reliably across diverse datasets and geographic settings. Alongside these strengths, we also highlight remaining challenges such as computational cost and the limited availability of reusable AI-ready training data for landslide research. Overall, our study positions GeoFMs as a step toward more robust and scalable approaches for landslide risk reduction and environmental monitoring.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addressing landslide mapping challenges across different sensors and regions
Overcoming limited training data for accurate disaster prediction models
Improving model adaptability to spectral variations and geographic diversity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Geospatial foundation models adapt across sensors and domains
Global pretraining with self-supervision enables robust generalization
Fine-tuning maintains accuracy under label scarcity conditions
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
W
Wenwen Li
School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University
Sizhe Wang
Sizhe Wang
Washington University in Saint Louis
LLM NLP
H
Hyunho Lee
School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University
C
Chenyan Lu
School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University
S
Sujit Roy
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center
Rahul Ramachandran
Rahul Ramachandran
NASA/MSFC
InformaticsData Science
C
Chia-Yu Hsu
School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University