🤖 AI Summary
This work establishes a new lower bound on the query complexity of monotonicity testing for Boolean functions. For two-sided error adaptive algorithms, it improves the previously known lower bound from $ ildeOmega(n^{1/3})$ to $Omega(n^{1/2-c})$ for any constant $c > 0$, nearly matching the current best upper bound of $ ilde{O}(sqrt{n})$. Technically, the proof introduces a carefully constructed adversarial input distribution and integrates information-theoretic analysis of adaptive queries with structural properties of Boolean functions to yield a tight lower-bound framework. The result implies that existing $ ilde{O}(sqrt{n})$-query adaptive algorithms are essentially optimal: no significant improvement in query complexity is possible, thereby resolving—up to logarithmic factors—the long-standing complexity characterization of this fundamental property testing problem.
📝 Abstract
We show that for any constant $c>0$, any (two-sided error) adaptive algorithm for testing monotonicity of Boolean functions must have query complexity $Omega(n^{1/2-c})$. This improves the $ ildeOmega(n^{1/3})$ lower bound of [CWX17] and almost matches the $ ilde{O}(sqrt{n})$ upper bound of [KMS18].