Optimizing for the decision not the prediction: an exploration of Smooth Net Benefit as a training objective

πŸ“… 2026-09-11
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ“ Abstract
Objective Prediction models are commonly trained using objectives such as Bernoulli negative log-likelihood (NLL), although downstream clinical decisions may depend on specific risk thresholds. We introduce Smooth Net Benefit ($Οƒ$NB), a differentiable approximation of Net Benefit designed to align model training with threshold-specific clinical utility. Materials and Methods We evaluated $Οƒ$NB as a training objective for logistic regression, generalized additive models (GAMs), and XGBoost with three Hessian implementations. Experiments used the Framingham cardiovascular risk dataset and 44 TabZilla datasets comprising 72 dataset-threshold combinations. Results $Οƒ$NB training did not consistently improve Net Benefit in Framingham. Across the TabZilla benchmark, mean standardized Net Benefit for logistic regression increased from 0.5669 with NLL to 0.5765 with $Οƒ$NB (mean difference 0.0096, 95% CI -0.0001 to 0.0193). For GAMs, mean standardized Net Benefit decreased from 0.5921 to 0.5625 (mean difference -0.0296, 95% CI -0.0721 to 0.0129). For XGBoost, NLL achieved 0.6745 compared with 0.6723--0.6735 across $Οƒ$NB implementations. In logistic regression, $Οƒ$NB gains were positively associated with the performance advantage of XGBoost over NLL-trained logistic regression. Discussion The effect of $Οƒ$NB was context dependent, with modest gains concentrated in logistic regression and little benefit for more flexible model classes. This suggests that decision-focused optimization may be most useful when limited model flexibility leaves greater scope for improvement. Conclusion Our results do not support $Οƒ$NB as a general replacement for NLL training, but support further investigation of decision-focused objectives in settings where conventional likelihood-based training may not adequately capture decision-relevant structure.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Net Benefit
risk thresholds
clinical utility
decision-focused optimization
Bernoulli negative log-likelihood
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Smooth Net Benefit
differentiable approximation
threshold-specific clinical utility
decision-focused optimization
K
Koen M. F. Gorgels
Department of Data Science and Biostatistics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
L
Lasai BarreΓ±ada
Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Maarten van Smeden
Maarten van Smeden
University Medical Center Utrecht
Medical statisticsMethodsPredictionData scienceMachine learning
Ben Van Calster
Ben Van Calster
Professor of Medical Statistics, KU Leuven
Prediction modelingbiostatistics
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Professor of Clinical Biostatistics, UMC Utrecht & LUMC
Regression models and Prediction Research
W
Wouter A. C. van Amsterdam
Department of Data Science and Biostatistics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands