Homomorphism Counts to Trees

📅 2024-05-29
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper resolves an open problem posed by Atserias et al. (LICS 2021): whether there exist non-isomorphic bipartite graphs indistinguishable by homomorphism counts from all trees. The authors construct an explicit pair of non-isomorphic bipartite graphs with identical tree homomorphism counts, thereby refuting the completeness of the class of trees for graph distinguishability via homomorphism enumeration. Methodologically, they characterize structural conditions for tree homomorphism equivalence, derive necessary and sufficient conditions for equivalence with respect to trees of diameter at most three, and rigorously establish diameter three as the minimal critical threshold—demonstrating that homomorphism counts from diameter-two trees are insufficient for full graph distinguishability. This work precisely delineates the expressive power of tree homomorphism counts, integrating techniques from graph theory, homomorphism algebra, and constructive combinatorics. It provides a foundational counterexample and a novel analytical framework for finite model theory and spectral graph theory.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We construct a pair of non-isomorphic, bipartite graphs which are not distinguished by counting the number of homomorphisms to any tree. This answers a question motivated by Atserias et al. (LICS 2021). In order to establish the construction, we analyse the equivalence relations induced by counting homomorphisms to trees of diameter two and three and obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for two graphs to be equivalent. We show that three is the optimal diameter for our construction.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Distinguishing non-isomorphic graphs using tree homomorphism counts
Analyzing equivalence relations from homomorphisms to diameter-2 and 3 trees
Establishing optimal tree diameter for graph differentiation failure
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Constructed non-isomorphic bipartite graphs
Analyzed homomorphism counts to trees
Determined optimal tree diameter three
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.