Lessons in co-creation: the inconvenient truths of inclusive sign language technology development

📅 2024-08-23
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 5
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

206K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This study identifies structural barriers impeding Deaf community co-creation in sign language AI development. Method: Drawing on participatory observation, collaborative analysis, and critical discourse reflection conducted during two EU Horizon 2020 sign language machine translation projects (2021–2023), the research integrates crip theory and participatory AI design frameworks. Contribution/Results: It proposes five empirically grounded, actionable co-design principles: (1) recognizing Deaf people’s invisible labor; (2) employing accessible science communication to manage stakeholder expectations; (3) deconstructing ableism through disability justice; (4) mitigating co-creation fatigue and addressing intersectionality via methodological pluralism; and (5) advancing Deaf leadership to redistribute power. As the first empirically informed, multi-stakeholder analysis of AI co-creation practices, this work advances both theoretical understanding and practical guidance for inclusive AI design—particularly for minoritized languages and disabled communities.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In the era of AI-driven language technologies, the participation of deaf communities in sign language technology development, often framed as co-creation, is increasingly emphasized. We present a reflexive case study of two Horizon 2020 projects on sign language machine translation (2021- 2023), conducted with a EUD, a European-level deaf-led NGO. Using participant observation, internal documentation, and collaborative analysis among the authors, we interrogate co-creation as both a practice and a discourse. We offer five lessons for making co-creation consequential: 1) recognise and resource deaf partners invisible labor, 2) manage expectations via accessible science communication, 3) crip co-creation by dismantling structural ableism, 4) diversify participatory methods to address co-creation fatigue and intersectionality, and 5) redistribute power through deaf leadership. We contribute an empirically grounded account of how co-creation plays out in multi-partner AI projects, and actionable implications for design that extend to participatory AI with minoritized language and disability communities.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Examining co-creation practices in sign language technology development with deaf communities
Addressing structural ableism and power imbalances in participatory AI projects
Developing inclusive methodologies for deaf leadership in machine translation research
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Co-creation with deaf communities in sign language technology
Participant observation and collaborative analysis methods
Redistributing power through deaf leadership in AI
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.