๐ค AI Summary
This study addresses the limitations of traditional character modeling in literary analysis, which overemphasizes appearance frequency while neglecting crucial narrative dimensions such as discourse about characters by others and distinctions between narrator and character voices. Drawing on Wolochโs theory of โthe one vs. the many,โ the authors propose a six-dimensional structural model for character representation. Integrating large language models with a task-specific Transformer architecture, this approach enables a multidimensional computational characterization of fictional characters. It moves beyond frequency-centric paradigms by offering the first quantitative operationalization of implicit dimensions like โdiscourse by others.โ Empirical validation on a corpus of 19th-century British realist novels not only confirms key theoretical assumptions but also uncovers nuanced relationships between character centrality and gender dynamics.
๐ Abstract
Characters in novels have typically been modeled based on their presence in scenes in narrative, considering aspects like their actions, named mentions, and dialogue. This conception of character places significant emphasis on the main character who is present in the most scenes. In this work, we instead adopt a framing developed from a new literary theory proposing a six-component structural model of character. This model enables a comprehensive approach to character that accounts for the narrator-character distinction and includes a component neglected by prior methods, discussion by other characters. We compare general-purpose LLMs with task-specific transformers for operationalizing this model of character on major 19th-century British realist novels. Our methods yield both component-level and graph representations of character discussion. We then demonstrate that these representations allow us to approach literary questions at scale from a new computational lens. Specifically, we explore Woloch's classic"the one vs the many"theory of character centrality and the gendered dynamics of character discussion.