Common to Whom? Regional Cultural Commonsense and LLM Bias in India

📅 2026-01-22
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the limitation of existing cultural commonsense benchmarks, which often treat nations as homogeneous entities and overlook internal regional variation. To remedy this, the authors construct Indica—the first benchmark for evaluating regional cultural commonsense in India—comprising 1,630 human-annotated, region-specific question-answer pairs across eight everyday domains from five major Indian regions. The work systematically assesses large language models’ capacity to understand regional cultural nuances and reveals significant geographic bias: only 39.4% of questions exhibit nationwide consensus, and model accuracy on regional questions ranges merely from 13.4% to 20.9%, with pronounced overrepresentation of north-central perspectives and underestimation of eastern and western regions. The proposed framework, grounded in anthropological principles for question design, regional data collection, and bias quantification, offers a generalizable approach for evaluating cultural competence in other multicultural nations.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Existing cultural commonsense benchmarks treat nations as monolithic, assuming uniform practices within national boundaries. But does cultural commonsense hold uniformly within a nation, or does it vary at the sub-national level? We introduce Indica, the first benchmark designed to test LLMs'ability to address this question, focusing on India - a nation of 28 states, 8 union territories, and 22 official languages. We collect human-annotated answers from five Indian regions (North, South, East, West, and Central) across 515 questions spanning 8 domains of everyday life, yielding 1,630 region-specific question-answer pairs. Strikingly, only 39.4% of questions elicit agreement across all five regions, demonstrating that cultural commonsense in India is predominantly regional, not national. We evaluate eight state-of-the-art LLMs and find two critical gaps: models achieve only 13.4%-20.9% accuracy on region-specific questions, and they exhibit geographic bias, over-selecting Central and North India as the"default"(selected 30-40% more often than expected) while under-representing East and West. Beyond India, our methodology provides a generalizable framework for evaluating cultural commonsense in any culturally heterogeneous nation, from question design grounded in anthropological taxonomy, to regional data collection, to bias measurement.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

cultural commonsense
regional variation
LLM bias
India
sub-national diversity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

cultural commonsense
regional bias
LLM evaluation
Indica benchmark
anthropological taxonomy