Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Shuffling: Tight Upper and Lower Bounds

📅 2026-05-07
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

230K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the lack of tight and interpretable analyses for the privacy–utility trade-off in existing DP-SGD under random shuffling with subsampling. Within the f-DP framework, we provide the first transparent closed-form privacy bound for this mechanism, deriving tight and interpretable upper and lower bounds on the privacy trade-off function. We introduce a novel proof technique surpassing the Berry–Esseen theorem, combined with a generalized law of large numbers, to reveal the asymptotic behavior of privacy loss under multiple compositions—converging toward the ideal random-guessing diagonal. Under the condition σ ≥ √(3/ln M), a single training epoch achieves practical differential privacy with δ = 0.01 using only approximately 1.14×10⁷ samples, and across multiple epochs, the dependence of δ improves from linear to O(√E).
📝 Abstract
We derive a tight analysis of the trade-off function for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) with subsampling based on random shuffling within the $f$-DP framework. Our analysis covers the regime $σ\geq \sqrt{3/\ln M}$, where $σ$ is the noise multiplier and $M$ is the number of rounds within a single epoch. Unlike $f$-DP analyses for Poisson subsampling, which yield non-closed implicit formulas that can be machine computed but are non-transparent, random shuffling admits a tight analysis yielding transparent and interpretable closed-form bounds. Our concrete bounds, derived via the Berry-Esseen theorem, are tight up to constant factors within the proof framework. We demonstrate worked parameter settings for a single epoch ($E=1$) with a corresponding trade-off function $\geq 1-a-δ$, that is, only $δ$ below the ideal random guessing diagonal $1-a$: For $δ= 1/100$ and $σ= 1$, roughly $M \approx 1.14\times 10^6$ rounds and $N \approx 1.14\times 10^7$ training samples suffice to achieve meaningful differential privacy. This is in contrast to recent negative results for the regime $σ\leq 1/\sqrt{2 \ln M}$. Our concrete bounds can be composed over multiple epochs leading to $δ$ having a linear in $E$ dependency, which restricts $E=O(\sqrt{M})$. To go beyond Berry--Esseen, we introduce a new proof technique based on a generalization of the law of large numbers that yields an asymptotic random guessing diagonal-limit result: if $E=c_M^2M$ with $c_M\to 0$, then the $E$-fold composed trade-off function satisfies $f^{\otimes E}(a)\to 1-a$ uniformly in $a\in[0,1]$ with $δ$ having only an $O(\sqrt{E})$ dependency. We compare this asymptotic regime with the corresponding Poisson subsampling asymptotic, and highlight the characterization of explicit convergence rates as an open question.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

DP-SGD
random shuffling
subsampling
f-DP
trade-off function
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

random shuffling
f-DP
tight bounds
Berry-Esseen theorem
differential privacy
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.