đ€ AI Summary
This paper investigates the failure mechanisms of linear programming (LP) hierarchiesâsuch as SheraliâAdams, LovĂĄszâSchrijver, and Lift-and-Projectâin symmetric integer programs (IPs), focusing on the ((k+1))-transitive symmetry setting.
Method: We establish a unified algebraicâgeometric framework that bridges LP hierarchy techniques with group-theoretic analysis, introducing a joint geometricâalgebraic modeling approach based on symmetry measures and face-intersection conditions between the relaxed polytope and low-dimensional faces of the hypercube.
Contribution/Results: We prove that multiple LP hierarchies are equivalent under such symmetry, revealing that performance bottlenecks stem from geometric intersectionsânot merely algebraic structure. Our framework yields a concise, geometrically grounded criterion for certifying lower bounds on integrality gaps, thereby providing a novel paradigm for analyzing relaxation tightness in symmetric IPs.
đ Abstract
The presence of symmetries is one of the central structural features that make some integer programs challenging for state-of-the-art solvers. In this work, we study the efficacy of Linear Programming (LP) hierarchies in the presence of symmetries. Our main theorem unveils a connection between the algebraic structure of these relaxations and the geometry of the initial integer-empty polytope: We show that under $(k+1)$-transitive symmetries--a measure of the underlying symmetry in the problem--the corresponding relaxation at level $k$ of the hierarchy is non-empty if and only if the initial polytope intersects all $(n-k)$-dimensional faces of the hypercube. In particular, the hierarchies of Sherali-Adams, Lov'asz-Schrijver, and the Lift-and-Project closure are equally effective at detecting integer emptiness. Our result provides a unifying, group-theoretic characterization of the poor performance of LP-based hierarchies, and offers a simple procedure for proving lower bounds on the integrality gaps of symmetric polytopes under these hierarchies.