Pushing the Boundary of Quantum Advantage in Hard Combinatorial Optimization with Probabilistic Computers

📅 2025-03-13
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
The practical quantum advantage of quantum computers for real-world optimization problems remains unproven. Method: This work proposes a hardware–algorithm co-design framework based on probabilistic computers (p-computers) for hard combinatorial optimization, challenging the boundaries of claimed quantum advantage. Contribution/Results: (1) First experimental demonstration on 3D spin glass benchmarks showing superior residual energy scaling of p-computers versus D-Wave quantum annealers; (2) A novel hardware-aware paradigm for DT-SQA and APT algorithms, incorporating nonlocal equal-energy cluster updates and extreme-value-theory-driven universal scaling laws; (3) A single-chip, multi-replica, asynchronous parallel architecture enabling million-spin updates. Experimental results demonstrate energy efficiency improvements of several orders of magnitude over software-based simulations, while maintaining scalability and ultra-low power consumption—establishing a viable pathway toward practical, application-specific optimization hardware.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Recent demonstrations on specialized benchmarks have reignited excitement for quantum computers, yet whether they can deliver an advantage for practical real-world problems remains an open question. Here, we show that probabilistic computers (p-computers) when co-designed with hardware to implement powerful Monte Carlo algorithms surpass state-of-the-art quantum annealers [href{https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05867-2}{King et al., Nature (2023)}] in solving hard optimization problems. We focus on two key algorithms: discrete-time simulated quantum annealing (DT-SQA) and adaptive parallel tempering (APT), both applied to 3D spin glasses. For DT-SQA, we find that increasing the number of replicas improves residual energy scaling, while parallelizing fewer replicas across independent runs also achieves comparable scaling. Both strategies align with the theoretical expectations from extreme value theory. In addition, APT outperforms DT-SQA when supported by non-local isoenergetic cluster moves. Finite-size scaling analysis suggests a universal behavior that explains the superior performance of APT over both DT-SQA and quantum annealing. We show that these algorithms are readily implementable in modern hardware thanks to the mature semiconductor technology. Unlike software simulations, replicas can be monolithically housed on a single chip and a large number of spins can be updated in parallel and asynchronously, similar to a quantum annealer. We project that custom Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) or specialized chips leveraging massive parallelism can further accelerate these algorithms by orders of magnitude, while drastically improving energy efficiency. Our results challenge the notion of a practical quantum advantage in optimization and present p-computers as scalable, energy-efficient hardware for real-world optimization problems.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Explores whether probabilistic computers outperform quantum annealers in optimization.
Focuses on algorithms for solving hard 3D spin glass optimization problems.
Demonstrates scalability and energy efficiency of p-computers for real-world applications.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Probabilistic computers surpass quantum annealers in optimization.
DT-SQA and APT algorithms improve 3D spin glass solutions.
FPGA and specialized chips enhance algorithm efficiency and speed.
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Shuvro Chowdhury
Shuvro Chowdhury
University of California, Santa Barbara
Probabilistic and Neuromorphic ComputingQuantum ComputingMachine LearningNanoelectronics
Navid Anjum Aadit
Navid Anjum Aadit
PhD Candidate, University of California, Santa Barbara
Probabilistic ComputingHardware AccelerationMachine LearningQuantum ComputingArtificial
Andrea Grimaldi
Andrea Grimaldi
PhD in Physics, University of Messina
Probabilistic computingspintronicsmachine-learning
E
Eleonora Raimondo
Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Physical Sciences and Earth Sciences, University of Messina, 98166, Messina, Italy; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143 Roma, Italy
Atharva Raut
Atharva Raut
Doctoral Student at Carnegie Mellon University
Integrated Circuits
P
P. A. Lott
USRA Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science (RIACS); Quantum Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (QuAIL), NASA Ames Research Center
J
Johan H. Mentink
Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Marek M. Rams
Marek M. Rams
Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
quantum many-body physics
Federico Ricci-Tersenghi
Federico Ricci-Tersenghi
Professor of Theoretical Physics, "La Sapienza" University, Roma
Statistical MechanicsDisordered and Complex SystemsNumerical SimulationsOptimization Problems
Massimo Chiappini
Massimo Chiappini
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
L
Luke S. Theogarajan
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
Tathagata Srimani
Tathagata Srimani
Assistant Professor, ECE, CMU
Giovanni Finocchio
Giovanni Finocchio
University of Messina
spintronicsmicromagnetic modelingsignal processing
Masoud Mohseni
Masoud Mohseni
Distinguished Technologist at Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Quantum PhysicsQuantum ComputingMachine LearningPhysics-Inspired Computing
K
Kerem Y. Camsari
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA