Human-AI collaborative autonomous synthesis with pulsed laser deposition for remote epitaxy

📅 2025-11-14
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the dual challenges of growth optimization and graphene preservation in pulsed laser deposition (PLD) of BaTiO₃/graphene remote epitaxial heterostructures. Methodologically, we establish a tightly coupled human–AI collaborative autonomous experimental workflow: a large language model (LLM) drives scientific hypothesis generation, experimental planning, and in situ Raman analysis, while a dynamically updated collaboration protocol enables real-time integration of human expert knowledge and AI reasoning across experimental batches—overcoming the latency limitations of conventional “human-in-the-loop” systems. Key contributions include: (i) the first closed-loop intelligent exploration of PLD process parameter space; (ii) efficient construction of a graphene-damage versus film-growth phase diagram, revealing the trade-off between graphene integrity and BaTiO₃ crystallinity within low-oxygen, low-pressure, and low-temperature regimes; and (iii) the proposal and experimental validation of a two-step Ar/O₂ deposition strategy enabling successful exfoliation of ferroelectric BaTiO₃ films while fully preserving the monolayer graphene interlayer.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Autonomous laboratories typically rely on data-driven decision-making, occasionally with human-in-the-loop oversight to inject domain expertise. Fully leveraging AI agents, however, requires tightly coupled, collaborative workflows spanning hypothesis generation, experimental planning, execution, and interpretation. To address this, we develop and deploy a human-AI collaborative (HAIC) workflow that integrates large language models for hypothesis generation and analysis, with collaborative policy updates driving autonomous pulsed laser deposition (PLD) experiments for remote epitaxy of BaTiO$_3$/graphene. HAIC accelerated the hypothesis formation and experimental design and efficiently mapped the growth space to graphene-damage. In situ Raman spectroscopy reveals that chemistry drives degradation while the highest energy plume components seed defects, identifying a low-O$_2$ pressure low-temperature synthesis window that preserves graphene but is incompatible with optimal BaTiO$_3$ growth. Thus, we show a two-step Ar/O$_2$ deposition is required to exfoliate ferroelectric BaTiO$_3$ while maintaining a monolayer graphene interlayer. HAIC stages human insight with AI reasoning between autonomous batches to drive rapid scientific progress, providing an evolution to many existing human-in-the-loop autonomous workflows.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Developing human-AI collaboration for autonomous pulsed laser deposition experiments
Mapping growth conditions to prevent graphene damage during remote epitaxy
Identifying synthesis windows balancing BaTiO3 growth and graphene preservation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Human-AI collaborative workflow with large language models
Autonomous pulsed laser deposition for remote epitaxy
Two-step Ar/O2 deposition preserving graphene interlayer
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Asraful Haque
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
D
D. Yimam
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
J
Jawad Chowdhury
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
R
Ralph Bulanadi
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
I
Ivan V Vlassiouk
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
J
Jack Lasseter
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
S
Sujoy Ghosh
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
C
Christopher M. Rouleau
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
Kai Xiao
Kai Xiao
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Organic electronicsNanomaterials and electronicsTwo-dimensional materials
Yongtao Liu
Yongtao Liu
R&D Staff, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Autonomous ExperimentAI/MLFerroelectricOptoelectronicScanning Probe Microscopy
E
Eva Zarkadoula
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
R
Rama K. Vasudevan
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
S
Sumner B. Harris
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States