🤖 AI Summary
Existing inconsistency thresholds for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices—containing unknown comparisons—lack interpretability, as their design ignores the underlying graph structure formed by known comparisons. Method: We establish that the threshold depends not merely on matrix size and number of missing entries, but fundamentally on the topology of the associated undirected comparison graph; we derive a quantitative relationship between the threshold and the graph’s spectral radius, and propose a dynamic inconsistency criterion grounded in spectral graph properties. Leveraging graph-theoretic modeling, spectral analysis, large-scale statistical simulation, and inconsistency proposition theory, we construct a real-time, embeddable threshold framework for decision support systems. Contribution/Results: The proposed method enables online anomaly detection during data collection and significantly enhances the robustness and reliability of multi-criteria decision making under incompleteness.
📝 Abstract
The inconsistency of pairwise comparisons remains difficult to interpret in the absence of acceptability thresholds. The popular 10% cut-off rule proposed by Saaty has recently been applied to incomplete pairwise comparison matrices, which contain some unknown comparisons. This paper revises these inconsistency thresholds: we uncover that they depend not only on the size of the matrix and the number of missing entries, but also on the undirected graph whose edges represent the known pairwise comparisons. Therefore, using our exact thresholds is especially important if the filling in patterns coincide for a large number of matrices, as has been recommended in the literature. The strong association between the new threshold values and the spectral radius of the representing graph is also demonstrated. Our results can be integrated into software to continuously monitor inconsistency during the collection of pairwise comparisons and immediately detect potential errors.