Flip Distance of Non-Crossing Spanning Trees: NP-Hardness and Improved Bounds

2026-03-23

AI Summary

This study investigates the computational complexity and diameter bounds of flip graphs for non-crossing spanning trees on point sets in convex position, where transformations are achieved via single-edge flips. We establish, for the first time, that computing the flip distance remains NP-hard even when restricted to compatible flips or rotation operations in convex position. To analyze reconfiguration processes, we introduce and extend the conflict graph framework. Furthermore, when one of the trees is a stacked tree, we construct a flip sequence of length at most $\frac{14}{9}(n-1)$. Additionally, we improve the lower bound on the diameter of the flip graph in convex position to $\frac{11}{7}n - o(n)$.

Technology Category

• Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization: Other Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction
• Search and Optimization: Combinatorial Optimization
• Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Computational Complexity of Reasoning

Application Category

• Graph Algorithms and Modeling for the Web: Efficient manipulation of static and dynamic Web-related graphs
• Economics, Online Markets and Human Computation: Incentives in network design for Web infrastructures and ecosystems
• Security and Privacy: Large-scale security measurements

Abstract

We consider the problem of reconfiguring non-crossing spanning trees on point sets. For a set $P$ of $n$ points in general position in the plane, the flip graph $F(P)$ has a vertex for each non-crossing spanning tree on $P$ and an edge between any two spanning trees that can be transformed into each other by the exchange of a single edge. This flip graph has been intensively studied, lately with an emphasis on determining its diameter diam$(F(P))$ for sets $P$ of $n$ points in convex position. The current best bounds are $\frac{14}{9}n-O(1) \leq$ diam$(F(P))<\frac{15}{9}n-3$ [Bjerkevik, Kleist, Ueckerdt, and Vogtenhuber; SODA 2025]. The crucial tool for both the upper and lower bound are so-called *conflict graphs*, which the authors stated might be the key ingredient for determining the diameter (up to lower-order terms). In this paper, we pick up the concept of conflict graphs and show that this tool is even more versatile than previously hoped. As our first main result, we use conflict graphs to show that computing the flip distance between two non-crossing spanning trees is NP-hard, even for point sets in convex position. Interestingly, the result still holds for more constrained flip operations, concretely, compatible flips (where the removed and the added edge do not cross) and rotations (where the removed and the added edge share an endpoint). Extending the line of research from [BKUV SODA25], we present new insights on the diameter of the flip graph. Their lower bound is based on a constant-size pair of trees, one of which is *stacked*. We show that if one of the trees is stacked, then the lower bound is indeed optimal up to a constant term, that is, there exists a flip sequence of length at most $\frac{14}{9}(n-1)$ to any other tree. Lastly, we improve the lower bound on the diameter of the flip graph $F(P)$ for $n$ points in convex position to $\frac{11}{7}n-o(n)$.

Problem

• flip distance
• non-crossing spanning trees
• NP-hardness
• convex position
• flip graph diameter

Innovation

• flip distance
• non-crossing spanning trees
• conflict graphs
• NP-hardness
• convex position