🤖 AI Summary
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) suffer from limited geometric reasoning capabilities due to the scarcity of high-quality geometric data; existing synthetic data generation methods suffer from low diversity, high noise, and poor image fidelity. Method: We propose GeoFM—a novel framework that formally models geometric structures via precise formal language, integrates symbolic computation engines for logical verification, and systematically composes geometric constraints within metric spaces to enable joint, high-fidelity, and diverse synthesis of geometric images and corresponding problem texts. Unlike template-based approaches, GeoFM generates logically rigorous synthetic data aligned with real-world problem distributions. Contribution/Results: When trained exclusively on GeoFM-synthesized data, our model achieves new state-of-the-art results on MathVista and GeoQA—outperforming GPT-4o by +18.7% and +16.5%, respectively, and surpassing the best open-source models by +5.7% and +2.7%. These gains demonstrate substantial improvements in geometric reasoning performance.
📝 Abstract
Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained significant attention in both academia and industry for their capabilities in handling multi-modal tasks. However, these models face challenges in mathematical geometric reasoning due to the scarcity of high-quality geometric data. To address this issue, synthetic geometric data has become an essential strategy. Current methods for generating synthetic geometric data involve rephrasing or expanding existing problems and utilizing predefined rules and templates to create geometric images and problems. However, these approaches often produce data that lacks diversity or is prone to noise. Additionally, the geometric images synthesized by existing methods tend to exhibit limited variation and deviate significantly from authentic geometric diagrams. To overcome these limitations, we propose GeoFM, a novel method for synthesizing geometric data. GeoFM uses formal languages to explore combinations of conditions within metric space, generating high-fidelity geometric problems that differ from the originals while ensuring correctness through a symbolic engine. Experimental results show that our synthetic data significantly outperforms existing methods. The model trained with our data surpass the proprietary GPT-4o model by 18.7% on geometry problem-solving tasks in MathVista and by 16.5% on GeoQA. Additionally, it exceeds the performance of a leading open-source model by 5.7% on MathVista and by 2.7% on GeoQA.