🤖 AI Summary
Medical visual question answering (VQA) has long suffered from a scarcity of high-quality, openly accessible training data. To address this, we propose the first scoring-criterion-guided, generate-then-verify two-stage framework for automatically synthesizing clinically accurate, modality-consistent multiple-choice VQA data from PubMed Central articles. Our method employs a large multimodal model as the generator, performing joint reasoning over medical images, figure captions, and corresponding textual content. A multi-level verifier—incorporating domain-specific consistency checks and a verifiable reward mechanism—enables reinforcement learning optimization and produces machine-auditable JSON outputs. We introduce MedSynVQA, a novel dataset comprising 13,087 questions spanning 13 imaging modalities and 28 anatomical regions. Evaluated on six medical VQA benchmarks, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance, notably attaining 77.57 on VQA-RAD—surpassing leading medical foundation models.
📝 Abstract
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) are increasingly capable of answering medical questions that require joint reasoning over images and text, yet training general medical VQA systems is impeded by the lack of large, openly usable, high-quality corpora. We present MedVLSynther, a rubric-guided generator-verifier framework that synthesizes high-quality multiple-choice VQA items directly from open biomedical literature by conditioning on figures, captions, and in-text references. The generator produces self-contained stems and parallel, mutually exclusive options under a machine-checkable JSON schema; a multi-stage verifier enforces essential gates (self-containment, single correct answer, clinical validity, image-text consistency), awards fine-grained positive points, and penalizes common failure modes before acceptance. Applying this pipeline to PubMed Central yields MedSynVQA: 13,087 audited questions over 14,803 images spanning 13 imaging modalities and 28 anatomical regions. Training open-weight LMMs with reinforcement learning using verifiable rewards improves accuracy across six medical VQA benchmarks, achieving averages of 55.85 (3B) and 58.15 (7B), with up to 77.57 on VQA-RAD and 67.76 on PathVQA, outperforming strong medical LMMs. A Ablations verify that both generation and verification are necessary and that more verified data consistently helps, and a targeted contamination analysis detects no leakage from evaluation suites. By operating entirely on open literature and open-weight models, MedVLSynther offers an auditable, reproducible, and privacy-preserving path to scalable medical VQA training data.