FASIONAD++ : Integrating High-Level Instruction and Information Bottleneck in FAt-Slow fusION Systems for Enhanced Safety in Autonomous Driving with Adaptive Feedback

📅 2025-03-11
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address insufficient planning safety in low-frequency complex driving scenarios, weak generalization of end-to-end models, and high computational overhead of vision-language models (VLMs), this paper proposes a fast-slow dual-system fusion architecture. The fast system employs a lightweight end-to-end model for real-time trajectory generation, while the slow system—driven by a VLM—is activated only upon detection of dynamic uncertainty to perform semantic reasoning and decision correction. Key innovations include an uncertainty-aware on-demand switching mechanism, an information bottleneck structure augmented with high-level planning feedback, and a bidirectional knowledge exchange mechanism integrating visual prompting and decision feedback. The method jointly incorporates uncertainty estimation, question-answering–based reasoning, reward-instructed training, and information bottleneck optimization. In open-loop evaluation, the approach reduces L2 trajectory error by 6.7% and collision rate by 28.1%.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Ensuring safe, comfortable, and efficient planning is crucial for autonomous driving systems. While end-to-end models trained on large datasets perform well in standard driving scenarios, they struggle with complex low-frequency events. Recent Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs) advancements offer enhanced reasoning but suffer from computational inefficiency. Inspired by the dual-process cognitive model"Thinking, Fast and Slow", we propose $ extbf{FASIONAD}$ -- a novel dual-system framework that synergizes a fast end-to-end planner with a VLM-based reasoning module. The fast system leverages end-to-end learning to achieve real-time trajectory generation in common scenarios, while the slow system activates through uncertainty estimation to perform contextual analysis and complex scenario resolution. Our architecture introduces three key innovations: (1) A dynamic switching mechanism enabling slow system intervention based on real-time uncertainty assessment; (2) An information bottleneck with high-level plan feedback that optimizes the slow system's guidance capability; (3) A bidirectional knowledge exchange where visual prompts enhance the slow system's reasoning while its feedback refines the fast planner's decision-making. To strengthen VLM reasoning, we develop a question-answering mechanism coupled with reward-instruct training strategy. In open-loop experiments, FASIONAD achieves a $6.7%$ reduction in average $L2$ trajectory error and $28.1%$ lower collision rate.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Enhance safety in autonomous driving systems
Address complex low-frequency driving events
Improve computational efficiency in reasoning modules
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Dynamic switching mechanism for system intervention
Information bottleneck optimizes guidance capability
Bidirectional knowledge exchange enhances decision-making
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
K
Kangan Qian
The School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Ziang Luo
Ziang Luo
Tsinghua University
Autonomous driving
Sicong Jiang
Sicong Jiang
McGill University, 2077AI
Large Language ModelsVision Language ModelsAutonomous DrivingTrustworthy AI
Zilin Huang
Zilin Huang
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Human-Centered AIHuman-AI CollaborationAutonomous DrivingRoboticsIntelligent Transportation
J
Jinyu Miao
The School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Z
Zhikun Ma
Waseda University, Japan
T
Tianze Zhu
The School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Jiayin Li
Jiayin Li
University of Minnesota, USA
Yangfan He
Yangfan He
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
AI AgentReasoningAI AlignmentFoundation Models
Zheng Fu
Zheng Fu
Tsinghua university
Y
Yining Shi
The School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Boyue Wang
Boyue Wang
Beijing University of Technology
Computer Vision
H
Hezhe Lin
The School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Ziyu Chen
Ziyu Chen
Chonqing University
DCOPsMAS
Jiangbo Yu
Jiangbo Yu
University of Washington
X
Xinyu Jiao
The School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
M
Mengmeng Yang
The School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Kun Jiang
Kun Jiang
Tsinghua University
autonomous driving
D
Diange Yang
The School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China